Between the computation / communication tradeoff, this would have to be a huge breakthrough for rendering.
284 karma · joined March 26, 2009
Between the computation / communication tradeoff, this would have to be a huge breakthrough for rendering.
the best I've used so far is trac, but their git support were flaky when I last tested it (only ran well with svn at the time)
BTW, the question implies PG is a role model for me. As awesome as he is, he's not.
I can't up vote you enough. Almost tempted to create new HN accounts just to up vote you.
With 'normal' code, if it's broken, something doesn't work, and you know to fix it. With crypto, if it's 'broken', all the valid requests still work, and you don't know that anything's wrong.
In fact, as far as I know, the only way to know if your crypto code is 'working', is to prove it ... in the form of, if you can somehow break my crypto, you will also be able to break problem X, where X is a problem the crypto community has generally accepted to be hard to solve.
I've been thinking of going into the iphone market myself, and more info will certainly help.
Thanks!
The former problem -- logic -- ended up giving us the AI winter, and it's the later (with machine learning) that is driving Google and modern robotics.
If this is just Mathematica + Prolog + A giant hand tuned database, I think it'll be a disappointment. (Look at the Cyc project -- led by a former Stanford professor, lots of funding, supposed to revolutionize human knowledge -- where is it now?)
every 20 years, have science advance enough to extend everyone's life by 30 years
(doesn't take care of things like getting hit by bus, but takes care of 'regular' life extension)
(iirc, there was some ted talk on this)
Instead of "Let's get C++ easier to debug"
why not:
"Let's only write performance intense parts in C++", and have the rest in an interpreted scripting language, where things like this (and more) come much cheaper?
Clearly, anyone who practices these rules religiously will end up living a very lonely, paranoid life.
However, as a nerd that doesn't understand social dynamics very well, I've found this book to be of immense defensive value -- I started seeing how people utilized these rules (either consciously or subconsciously) around me, and have been able to avoid being influenced / controlled by them.
I understand how URL shorteners work (hash the URL)
however, how do they make money?
I have pondered this route, but it seems that in general, the research community / academia tends to "shun" those that don't do straight undergrad -> research.
It's amazing what the response to
"I just recently graduated. Instead of going to Europe to get drunk for a year, I'd like to go home for a year and write software for my startup."
can be.