85 karma · joined February 13, 2018
You just lost your credibility.
I was trying to make it clear that people involved here are often helpless due to the pressures inherent in capitalism. I think when you start accepting investments, then you are even more helpless. But one the other hand, it helps one to justify any "evil" by delegating the blame to the investors, and how "we" have to protect "their" interests, so "we" are forced to do this bad thing.
The investors are often completely oblivious to the fact, and they too are blameless. So where does the blame really lie?
If we have a population of people who are not aware of the intricacies involved in self driving, and the current technical state of the art, it is pretty clear there would be entities who would capitalize on it, by claiming to have implemented self driving.
Now, the way they does is saying stuff that actually does not make that claim, but in effect projects it. So right now, we have Tesla people saying "We will start shipping full self driving features by august". And without no clear understanding of what comprises of "full self driving features", the stocks rise. Seriously, it is used everywhere. When a toilet cleaner that claims to kill 99.99% of bacteria, they are doing the same. They project a claim that is very hard to nullify. But that does not prevent it from boosting the sales.
Car companies are particularly at fault because what they are doing can be dangerous to the users.
I mean, we could be focusing 100% on the road ahead, and can still respond to peripheral events lightning fast..
I think this is why a lack of sleep can quite adversely affect driving. It seems that if you haven't slept well. the "behind the scene" processing takes a hit, which greatly impacts driving capability..
Do you have a citation for that?
They claimed what was technically impossible?
Has the reused items proven reliable and profitable in he long run, which was the only reason others were not doing the same...
1. I don't want to learn a bunch of new key bindings to switch between terminal and editor windows. With nvim, I can use the same process that I use to switch between buffers, to switch to a terminal window.
2. I can use the same process to copy to/from terminal/buffer windows, and use the full range of vim registers in the process.
3. I can name terminal buffers in the same way I name editor windows, and use the names to switch to the terminal window.
People, by default, will consume stuff that enables exploitation (Ads, Facebook and its friends, porn etc). Very few ll actively seek out stuff that empowers them, even when provided access.
But when you provide only, say, facebook, in the name of giving Internet, to a population, you open a new channel to that population, that is solely meant to exploit. This is probably what facebook tried to do with India and failed.
No. You are not missing the potential. But you do not seem to get difference in magnitude. One is incremental, reviewed safety enhancement, Other is unpredictably catastrophic.
You only seem to grasp very superficial aspects of my comments, which is why I requested to give some thought before responding. So I think there is some kind of barrier. But it is not of language. but for lack of a better word, I think it is of a lack of enough shared sensibilities..
And I am not sure if it is contamination or something else, but the adverse effect often result in some sort of paralysis. If you take the kid to the doctors, first they will ignore you and say that vaccines cannot cause these effects. These are from the experience of another parent in India. You can see the interview here [1].
Government here is only interested in boasting the number of vaccinations given during their term. But have no concern about the aftermath, and things like this [2] often does not go anywhere. There are cases were a vaccine manufacture were able to provide vaccines that resulted in deaths of 4 kids, after the same companies vaccine was used in another campaign 2 years before that resulted in death of multiple children.
What I am saying is that, we should be careful.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E4WKDB-7pI&t=32s [2] http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/health/heath-ministry-to-st...
Please take a look at this [1] & [2]. It is similar to what you are saying.
[1] https://www.livemint.com/Politics/XS6vPor5jFX3vKkaE7Ri6H/Ind...
[2] http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/is-india-actually-free...
The point you are missing is that while update might be slightly enhance safety, the negative, unpredictable impact might be catastrophic. because one is planned and other one is not.
Where did you pull those numbers from?
Wrong. We didn't know that. We hoped the co2 will be cleaned up by the mechanisms already in place, and we thought the effect would only be temporary. Just like we think the holes caused by the rockets are temporary now, and will not have any cascading effects.
Incredibly short sighted and We have learned nothing from history if we continue to reason like this.
Can you write more about this here? What were your simple experiments, and why haven't people looking for it found it out already, if they are simple?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/bertelschmitt/2016/10/14/german...
Please explain.
>You've also clearly haven't understood anything I've said during this entire conversation.
Oh I understood you just fine. I just find it stupid.
>You've utterly failed to establish that they are lying.
That is because you are overly generous with assumptions to justify their claims, which is typical of people who are apologetic of fraudulent entities such as Musk
>Tesla already has an established history...
But they haven't save the planet yet. Please give some thought about what you are writing before responding.
That is what people thought about automobiles emitting co2. If we have learned anything, we would be extremely wary of anything that causes big disruptions in the environments, how ever innocent it might seem...
I have nothing else to add. Thanks for the laughs.
Not deducing. By what they explicitly state in the manual. About the "need to keep hands on the wheel always". So again. I am not "deducing" it.
>So why isn't the person who coined the term 'homo sapien' blatantly evil for coining the term?
I don't know. Was the person who coined the the term trying to sell human beings as being wise? Are people suffering because of this word? What is your goddamn point?
Tesla is evil because they use lies to SELL. use lies and project a false image to get INVESTMENT. Please keep this in mind when coming up with further examples.
>The existence of imperfectly stated motivations doesn't cause a cessation of causal history.
Ha. Now you are talking about "history" that does not exist yet. Are you really this misguided or just faking it?