1,367 karma · joined October 8, 2016
Especially interested in systems scaling & IAM and also general interest in most of thing on backend side.
You can reach me via <username>@<username>.net
Note: IANAL, I'm a complete layperson.
From what I could understand it sounds like 4 other district courts have ruled (around 31:30) on similar issues by siding that Eminent Domain does not apply on police actions while 4th has apparently ruled differently (I do not know which case they are referring to) & there were some arguments that earlier John Corp case from 5th Circuit (I believe https://casetext.com/case/john-corp-v-city-of-houston) already split the district courts.
To me it did sound like judges were taking the city side more though they did also ask for what kind of test should be implemented if they did rule in favor of Bakers.
Hopefully they do end up affirming the lower court decision but let's see.
For example I would like to calculate the impact of wash sale or seeing the tax impact for selling from certain lot (in terms of short/long term taxes). And if you did these what would your tax impact look like if you sold things at expected mark growth rate (or certain value you set).
That's might be the current situation but it does not mean that will last. If the license changes again or if they e.g. decide stop the development, it will be a lot harder to make a fork in order to e.g. keep up to date with security patches.
> these problems with the Terraform core repository are not new
> The only material change over the past ~14 days, in our opinion, is that certain business’s have had their margin profile change.
Often people deal with things until something breaks camel's back. In this case it was the license change for many companies/users and hopefully it will mean that OpenTF will end up fixing those earlier problems as well.
If they are private person they can attempt to judgement via court and let enforcement authority liquidate their assets or garnish their wages.
There's also requirement (with some exceptions) to make offer to buy publicly listed company's shares when the shareholder's control over the votes increases above 30% and 50%. Normally the price in that case would be the highest price that shareholder paid for the shares during previous 6 months.
The valuation is decided during the arbitration process. From what I understand if there has been previous offer to buy it's quite likely that will be used at least as initial basis for the price.
There seems to be at least one English article about the process: https://insights.fondia.com/fi/en/articles/corporate-law/sha...
No clue if there are similar laws in Germany or other countries.
For my 1 br apartment living alone the total bill has been about $100-$150 but can jump to up to $250 during summer months. Sounds like this will almost double my costs for most of the year.
https://radar.cloudflare.com/traffic/verified-bots
https://blog.cloudflare.com/friendly-bots/
> At Cloudflare, we manually “verify” good bots, so they don’t get blocked.
The only fix is to navigate back to page somehow, either by going to address bar and pressing enter (to navigate there again instead of reloading) or finding some link that points you back to the page.
I wouldn't be surprised if those POSTs will end up banning you from some website since they "know" you shouldn't POSTing to that page so clearly you are evil bot trying to hack them.
Not to dual-status individuals for example. Those individuals must mail/fax their return to IRS.
https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/150ozmc/twitter_has_l...
One thing that I don't often see mentioned are invoices. In Finland you can get many of them delivered as standardized e-invoice to your bank. This then allows you to setup automatic payment for them on your side (pay on the due date, set maximum value that will be approved automatically if the amount is not static). For consumer protection if the due date falls on weekend/bank holiday, the due date in reality is the first normal day. It's also the day when you need to make the payment, it doesn't need to arrive on seller's account on that date (though these days it normally will).
* Old refresh token can be used. Using it will revoke previous "new" tokens (and possibly generate some warnings, especially if new tokens are used after this)
* Using new access token will revoke old refresh token and access tokens, possibly requiring access on dedicated path (something like lookup, essentially confirming that you received it)
This probably should be rate limited to avoid malicious/buggy client filling the revoke list with junk. And it may also make sense to decrease the lifetime of the old refresh token (e.g. if it was originally going to expire in 24h make it expire in 30 minutes) or set maximum of times this swap can happen.
Of course this would still cause issues if e.g. database server where these were stored failed and client had to restore from backups.
I assume they mean CPU sockets.
The attachments (essentially similar to the terms in Common Paper) are readable in English at https://it-ehdot.fi/tutustu-ehtoihin/ ("ENGLANNIKSI" tab), but the agreement template (similar to the cover letter) requires buying them.
And it's not like Apple would need to verify anything. They can grant the license, but say that the only supported configuration is Mac, it's up to VMWare and such to provide the support if they want to say that you can run OS X on their platform.