This explains why Vizio, who is owned by Walmart, was not sued.
6,290 karma · joined May 27, 2023
This explains why Vizio, who is owned by Walmart, was not sued.
The pro-cannabis American Rights and Reform PAC has donated $1 million to a Trump-aligned super PAC.
Several cannabis companies donated to Trump's inaugural fund."
https://www.axios.com/2025/12/12/trump-marijuana-federal-res...
In order to define an act as a war crime, this act must, besides having nexus to an armed conflict, be a serious violation of international humanitarian law and entail individual criminal responsibility."
https://www.rulac.org/legal-framework/international-criminal...
Contextual and combinatorial structure in sperm whale vocalisations https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40288582
And that’s before you even touch the whole anti-segregation angle running through the story.
Not saying that's the case in this particular incident though.
https://bulgarianmilitary.com/amp/2025/03/09/russian-media-c...
"This acquisition is not merely about expanding Walmart's product lineup but rather part of a sophisticated commercial strategy to integrate its retail operations, owned media channels and TV hardware into a cohesive ecosystem. This ecosystem is designed to generate and share data, influence shopping behavior and, ultimately, drive sales through an innovative approach to advertising..." "...By owning a television manufacturer, Walmart can now directly serve and, crucially, measure the impact of ads on consumer behavior. This capability significantly enhances Walmart's potential to convert advertisements into retail purchases."
https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcou...
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/we-lack-the-power-just...
The FBI?
Ephedrine, anhydrous ammonia, syringes, drones/UAVs, fireworks, high powered laser pointers are just a few things that are misused by a small minority but are restricted because the bad actors create outsized harm
For those interested in the actual case, here's some deeper coverage of this bruhaha including how Lee may have perjured himself during deposition.
Isn't Apple the only foreign brand with any kind of foothold in China?
Original source (Fr): https://www.politico.eu/article/le-parquet-de-paris-ouvre-un...
NHTSA, CFPB, DoT (FAA), DoE
[1] https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/02/21/musk-doge...
Edit: there's clearly several ways to interpret what he said. I'm not making any kind of argument here, just answering op's question.