DynamicUser and ProtectSystem keep me sane.
70 karma · joined June 18, 2023
DynamicUser and ProtectSystem keep me sane.
So far it feels like only LDAP really makes use of it, at least with the tech I interact with
Relatively simple inside a network range you control but no idea how that works across different networks in geographical redundant setups
Chan yin-lam case is one that always sticks in my head.
I can well believe correlation is sometimes the answer but the odds of an award winning swimmer doing a midnight dip and washing up naked the next day, with a rushed police investigation and extremely expedited cremation is a fair bit to accept as coincidence
We might one day have it natively with ipv6 adoption increasing.
I'll add this to my pile of filo made security I consistently rely on
It would be a garbage fire in any language
New CA is minted, public key is added to the accepted list, client signing start using the new CA and you remove the old after a short while.
If missing servers is a common problem it sounds like there are some other fundamental problems outside just authenticated user sessions.
It's xml but at least it's plain and well documented with sensible defaults
In context with the assistance and access act 2018 this is just another step towards the encryption with government backdoors future ASIO have been calling for in order to "protect us"
Theming seemed fine? I picked up someone's stylesheet off GitHub and that was it.