Google's goal isn't to prevent themselves from getting your info, but to prevent random 3rd parties from tricking you out of it. That would seem like a high bar to set a decade ago.
1,257 karma · joined August 9, 2011
Google's goal isn't to prevent themselves from getting your info, but to prevent random 3rd parties from tricking you out of it. That would seem like a high bar to set a decade ago.
Why?
I will say feeding my future father in law a glass casarole was not a strong move.
There is no one universally great input method.
The transition wasn't smooth unless you had a corporate backer who paid for your milti-thousand-dollar hardware regularly.
Also what are SFPs?
Transporting millions in cash is risky (either you trust the courier with that and risk their life, or you do it yourself and risk yours), and doing so internationally is extremely challenging and/or expensive. By contrast, doing it digitally is quite easy and fast.
It feels a bit disingenuous to insist the two are the same.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stable_marriage_problem#Soluti...
Edit: spelling
1. Gather hate mail. Find whatever complaints you can about the product and team you've just inherited.
2. Use the product. Try and break it. Act like an angry QA engineer.
3. Find the person or people who support customers on the product. Ask them what makes their job suck. Ask what's broken.
4. Ask them why they think it sucks / is broken - preferably outside the office (coffee, lunch, etc).
5. Meet dev team. Ask them why the product matters. Gauge their interest and understanding of the problem and customers. Ask what they think is important to address as a team.
6. Combine answers to 3-5, identify common threads. Look for places where there are common blocking factors (cost, time, focus, politics, history).
7. Find something to work on with the team, that can be delivered fast. Talk about what you want to do with support folks (from q3). Sanity check, make sure dev team understands the value of what they are working on.
8. Check in with superiors. Make sure you understand what's important to them. Talk about what you've heard.
I've found I can't come in and expect to be an expert in a given area overnight. But I can be good at asking questions and spotting painful things.
(edit: formatting)
Ex. "I could get more people on my team if we had less overhead".
It helped that our lead Agile Coach was the main advocate of this particular approach.
Source: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-da...
Edit: mis-referenced article 15 as export instead of access.
It's not even that far from Weird Stuff, and unless you work at Yahoo probably a bit easier to get to (being right along central expressway). Growing up in the valley, HSC was my hacker shop and where my love of analog electronics flourished.
If anything, the loss of Weird Stuff (which I am sad about) implies that garage days aren't about soldering resistors to a breadboard anymore. Hardware hackers are few and far between these days.
I'll admit to more than a little envy!
I'm sure you could find a shipping device that lacks them, but not from a major carrier in most of the world. Of Play-enabled devices, Google puts this at less than 5% worldwide
Here's my problem: I try to maintain a good work life balance. I devote time outside of work to passions, hobbies and relationships. But I am not dogmatic about hours. My company does not pay me to have my butt in a chair. They pay me to get the job done.
The group made a decision. Someone (senior, but not leadership) disagrees. What do you do?
Same game, different ball.
It took her, (in her late 20s) : 18 months, multiple letters from therapists and psychiatrists, some really solid medical reasons, and a lot of work to get her procedure. You want weapons-grade fertility treatments at 19? No problem. But you want to not have children? Ooh, you might regret it!!!
By contrast, my procedure involved a 15-minute conversation, and signing a paper which shortened the waiting period from 14 days to 72 hours. Same age. In San Francisco. At the same facility.
To me its just another way wealthy people increase their wealth and avoid paying taxes. No different then a bunch of hedge fund bros talking about using offshore accounts and fake charities to avoid paying taxes.