-1 karma · joined March 7, 2019
just because a test is giving you a result of doubling down on a particular feature, it doesn't mean you should.
now of course, if you just need the clicks so that you sell to the greater fool, by all means boost that engagement sister!
You'll look like a community expert and thought leader in no time.
Helps the resume inhalers that weigh these arbitrary things.
More complex questions about specific frameworks or how that might work with your ORM and memory cache just don't get the attention.
A lot of muslims don't consider or care about the governance model
I think your 'trick' is still masking a lack of very basic understanding about the vast population of people that aren't doing anything radical
don't trust testimonies, don't trust statements, or at LEAST recognize their infallibility
just understand the decision tree and how they change the options available during the legal process
in this case, we have:
- duress
- a short remorseful statement that is hoping to get his sentence reduced or even nullified
- no room for appeals court due to the plea agreement
the saying goes "remorse is for the courts", and unfortunately this will be used against me if I am ever indicted for something
Deconstruct what you wrote, in other circumstances why do you think there is a benefit to liking something that hasn't been liked before
You already have expanded the call to action of affirming your resonation with a post to something that transcends that action - meaning you aren't clicking the like button solely because you like the post - you decide to click it based on completely irrelevant unrelated factors (just like everyone else has), but you act like other people must be acting strange
This does that.
Your experience should go by the way side and tap into the productive capacity of people that shouldnt be distracted by pressure.
....because you would have had them 10-15 years sooner.
Just an observation of the study
I am curious how often this happens generally
I’ve been told to consider how issues evolve after they stop being reported, and so I am skeptical whether this is exceptional at all because aircraft groundings are only in the public interest because of the recent worldwide coordinated grounding
Are judgements in Britain worthwhile, monetarily?
Series F around the corner now
Assange was in a building, Snowden is in the largest country on the planet
possibilities
Invest in your SEO strategy like Wealthfront people!
I mean, or change the digits...
Ha really? He said that?
I felt the same way but a Californian’s vote doesnt influence representation
Its been a great few years: we operate better with agencies paralyzed, disarray in legislative consensus, and an ongoing appetite for risk in the markets. I understood which taxes would likely be lowered.
I remember being at the voting booth thinking of this decision tree. But there is nothing a Californian could have done by that point in time. I would say the outcome has been very accurate and predictable on these fronts.
It has been entertaining listening to other Californians tell me what people think if a left vote isnt deemed the clearly favorable vote for those people. I would say it doesnt really factor in what people think at all.
What? That was horrible! The simpletons talking about every mood change, or publicly plotting juvenile retribution against an ex-lover, or a respected keynote speaker who was previously isolated to that role now inviting you to Mafia Wars
I deleted my first “everyone I met everywhere” Facebook in 2008.
Allowing a new bare bones one in 2012 which is merely deactivated now.
This article is a mere nostalgic highlight reel, ironic how it complains then about instagram
Yeah ok, people in their 30s complain about selfies, selfie sticks, pictures of food, ephemeral stories, vertical videos, and older people using social media. They’re lost in between a dichotomy demographics that do not care and who these current networks are made for.
I would say the delayed gratisfaction is bigger component to the prior experience: planning, coordinating, and uploading just a few photos from different sources much later. The next day even, if your friends were tech savvy and had fast connections. The dopamine of social interaction coming in bursts, and the anticipation of the possibility having its own allure.
Sure 12 year olds blowing off steam in an FPS will go to quick play but people self organize
Many obscure mobile games have robust chats with the same regulars and centralized servers
Twitch communities and discord groups are pretty wild
Bad = additional tool state uses to potentially circumvent established rights in an unexpected way, which may result in prior assumptions about established rights becoming obsolete in subsequent court rulings
Good = things that dont do that
Yes, the consequences are a check on the use of this tool.
But thats only because the warrants werent sealed by the judge, the state law allowed for public knowledge, the detectives were willing to talk with media, and those available warrants happened to use discretion that is more agreeable so far.
So lets not get this confused with something good. All these people know it is a questionable tool and that as soon as they or anyone else in the public sector uses this more broadly then it is going to mess up their ability to use the tool at all.
/Facepalm
But before I go further on the social commentary, can we confirm that the arrest at work was the reason he lost his job, the week of being in jail being the reason he lost his job, performance due to the arrest being the reason?
The article makes it seem like an absurdity to the founding fathers to imagine such a large multi-national corporation being there. But they certainly could imagine this, the revolutionary war was a fight against the British East India Company inextricably tied to Britain until the entity dropped stewardship of these colonies out of budgetary concerns. Masquaraded as a decisive victory to support its new national identity, it was clear that corporate control of the government would not be the stance of the new American government.
Yes then the largest public company in the world moving there does theeaten this. But at the same time, that ship has long sailed and this just reminds everyone.
part of standard OPSEC is to run your typing through an anonimyzer tool. Hm thats not the colloquial names of those tools
Basically something to reduce the fingerprinting of how you write. Often times it makes you seem to have bad grammar, but some of the tools can intentionally give you the profile of a Russian person that learned English as a second language.
gives you an easy scapegoat to get away with the hacking, and gives the investigators an easy scapegoat to mask their incompetence
everyone here already agrees, now lets talk about this issue at hand.
As grandparent OP said, in recent years this has moved waaaaay beyond theory territory and been shown time and time again that <Corporate Sector> + NSA + FBI + CIA + intelligence agencies around the world all employ different ways of collecting analytical data broadcast over the internet.
NSA just taps the servers without telling anyone.
FBI sends National Security Letters containing gag orders preventing companies from telling you that the federal government is now a data sharing partner.
CIA just pays companies for it.
FISA court issues secret rulings justifying the legality of it all.
Whether that bothers you or not is up to you. Most people don't care. I usually don't. I wouldn't say "logic dictates this won't happen" when it is pretty much only the multi-national multi-billion dollar companies subject to this kind of tampering, and most incentivized to monetize the analytics by allowing these and unknown third parties in.
To avoid the security exhaustion, some people would simply prefer their text editor not be "smart", which is a euphemism for internet connected.