carsonreinke

I think I might actually try this out.

I feel like a project that could help with this to identify package importance by the dependents and downloads.

I believe you are missing a link to "This!"

I'm a little confused on why these other 2FA approaches are seen as more secure. Is it simply because the port transfer process can happen?

What is wrong with S/MIME?

> 500 pounds (about $650) a year for electricity and heating

I wonder how much specifically this is? Maybe if we could start sharing more of this info we could all set some goals.

I wonder how many comments said something about "Obama" or "left-wing"

Why in the world would they do this? Or was this just merely an accident?

You are really pushing the turd argument [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11661834]

Oh, duh, it explains it in the article: "misappropriation" insider trading

Can someone explain why this is illegal (besides any data/privacy breach within Capital One)?

Marketing helps market the awareness of these problems, even non-tech folk have heard of Heartbleed. More awareness probably means software is likely to be updated.

Maybe I am missing something here, but the Washinton Post says "Federal prosecutors stated in a memo accompanying the order that the software would affect only the seized phone". What is so wrong with that? If they just use it only on this phone? Or is that the weapon has been created and could be used?

Why is someone in a space suit at the crash site?

Just buy it on Alibaba [http://www.alibaba.com/trade/search?fsb=y&IndexArea=product_...].

Or http://followthatpage.com/

Pretty much all of the MLB stuff (except for playoffs) is cable only. NFL will at least of the either Monday or Thursday game along with your local on Sunday.

I mean if the Subresource is common place, someone might do this with a third party. The spec does not seem to address this.

I wonder about situations that is used with 3rd parties (such as Facebook) and how they could distribute changes.

A lot goes into the infrastructure of the carriers, I think most companies cannot afford this.

Clarification, https://blog.mailchimp.com/opt-in-vs-confirmed-opt-in-vs-dou..., http://support2.constantcontact.com/articles/FAQ/1586.

I'm not sure why it is not credible to use the term double opt-in, please explain.

No doubt, opt-out should not suffer these problems. Is it SPAM after that point? Maybe. I can see at that point the reputation system wins.

`it is spam to everybody`, maybe, but Google is trusting the user to categorize SPAM, which can have some unwanted consequences.

Double opt-in is an industry standard. Someone buying a list of email addresses is not. Some laws are now enforcing the concept such as CASL.

Either way, newsletters/transactional emails can all be marked as SPAM even though the recipient is legitimate. The sender can be negatively affected by a blind reputation system.

"List-Unsubscribe" for sure can be abused, but better then blindly considering every email flagged as SPAM.

Traditionally I consider SPAM only unsolicited emails, any double opt-in that is too high of volume that the user could be able to opt-out. Users marking as SPAM and decreasing reputation because of that seems like the wrong target.

That is annoying

Reputation can go wrong, legitimate emails with double opt-in still can be marked as SPAM by the user. Gmail definitely is slowing that down by offering a warning to the user when there is a `List-Unsubscribe` header. Even that still does not work and probably the reason by AT&T bill is sometimes marked as SPAM.

So if I own some land, can I copyright the landscape so no one can sell a picture of it?

...never assume one byte per glyph

Please no

Where does one get a master list?