censorsheep

Yes. What you said.

It wasn't me that downvoted you. I don't do that, even when I can. I can't on HN btw.

I'm in the 35-44 range.

A lot of people are making arguments without keeping things in perspective. First, people die. That is a fact of life. Our attempt to smooth out nature will be smyted in time. It will snap back. We are spending too much money. We are creating a fear-driven easily controlled society. We are encouraging censorship.

All of this stuff is very bad. Do you agree with that?

I am definitely an anti-lockdown person. I wanted to see the numbers for myself so I used data from the CDC's site and the WHO's site. Please check my math and reasoning https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3668979/is-this-an-...

My calculations for the Coronavirus death rate:

<5 0%

5-14 0%

15-24 0%

25-34 .04%

35-44 .12%

45-54 .37%

55-64 .9%

65-74 2.1%

75-84 5.5%

85+ 16.9%

Based on this data I think the lockdown is an absurdly heavy handed approach. Subjective opinion increases -> It's about older voters. In Eric Weinstein's words "they are hoarding well-being on every front" to the point that they will gladly screw over the younger generations.

We need to end this nonsense ASAP.