cerved

Is the a b test tired to the installation or the user?

I instruct Claude to write like peff, writes much better commit messages now

If only the streaming giants would let us stream in decent quality..

So it does a forced reset of the dirt after each bash command? Does it confuse Claude? I frequently find it lacks path awareness of what it's working directory is

Hey Boris, can you teach CC how to use cd?

Probably they tried a real operating system.

https://www.my-mooc.com/en/mooc/optimization-75993f57-f2df-4... https://www.coursera.org/learn/basic-modeling

It'll never happen. You can't distribute ZFS under GPL

ZFS and jails are two things FreeBSD does very well

Never had any issues but I've only ever tried to run it on supermicro boards

Do you mean compiler errors or some other kind of error message?

Claude is pretty good at forgetting to run maven with -am flag, writing bash with heredocs that it's interpreter doesn't weird out on, using the != operator in jq. Maybe Claude has early onset dementia.

Well glp1 doesn't make you want to eat broccoli. Just less in general

Funnily enough, not an article on grokipedia

To anyone wondering, I believe it's cursed because the finally continue blocks hijacks the try return, so the for loop never returns

You can't break encryption "only sometimes"

It's extremely common in graphic design because it's so easy for everyone to have an opinion.

> Honestly, a simple data-driven heatmap showing which parts of the code change most often or correlate with past bugs would probably give reviewers more trustworthy signals.

At first I thought this to but now I doubt that's a good heuristic. That's probably where people would be careful and/or look anyway. If I were to guess, regressions are less likely to occur in "hotspots".

But this is just a hunch. There are tons of well reviewed and bug reported open source projects, would be interesting if someone tested it.

> If it’s on the web, it’s digital, there was never a period when blogs were hand written.

This is just pedantic nonsense

Fixing btrfs RAID6 is becoming the Duke Nukem Forever of file systems

It needs MIR

You can go yell in the others people ear

Not a lot. Idk 25W TDP for the 16 core?

How much TDP and does it have 8+ sata with 10Gbe?

No. RAID 5/6 is still fundamentally broken and probably won't get fixed

Nah buy the right enterprise gear instead

https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/A2SDi-H-T...

I own this and it's worth it's weight in gold https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/A2SDi-H-T...

Yes. It's pricey but it's never been a problem. It can connect like 12 HDDs with 256GB ram and has 10GBe and runs at a tiny TDP. Has IPMI. Fits in a tiny case.

The only issue I had with this motherboard was that it was difficult to find someone who sold it. Love it

Also I don't see the built-in UPS. The external drives still use external power

Is that with ZFS or something else?

Mainly I wouldn't do it because of there's space and SATA ports it seems stupid. Hotter. Worse HW.

Can't really see much good reason to do it tbh except it's in a small hot case which is relatively easy to move around. Maybe if you do occasionally backups and you don't care about scrubbing and redundancy? Otherwise why not shuck them and throw them in a case?

Who makes the rules?

Yesterday I asked Gemini to recalculate the timestamps of tasks in a sequence of tasks, given it's duration and the previous timestamp. It proceeded to write code which gave results like this

  2025-09-26T14:32:10Z
  2025-09-26T14:32:10Z200s
  2025-09-26T14:32:10Z200s600s
  2025-09-26T14:32:10Z200s600s300s

It then proceeded to talk about how efficient this approach was for thousands of numbers.

Gemini is by far the dumbest LLM I've used