Businesses are more likely to totally block facebook rather than allow their important and legally binding email communications be run through an American social networking company.
255 karma · joined September 28, 2010
Businesses are more likely to totally block facebook rather than allow their important and legally binding email communications be run through an American social networking company.
First he says that "Facebook is killing email. It’s been happening slowly, and most techies disagree, but it’s been happening for a long time."
Then he goes on to admit "More importantly, Facebook isn’t seen as a serious platform. This is less true now than it used to be, but I would still hesitate to ask people to Facebook me in order to talk business – Facebook is for friends and family, email is for work."
"..email is for work."
So....Email will not die anytime soon then is what he is saying.
Can anyone see businesses around the world allowing facebook to peer in and access their company messaging and data? Never.
Email is dead. Long live email.
I sure don't prefer the mobile web. Apps are way easier for a user.
What percentage do you guys use apps vs mobile web. I would say apps 85% mob web 15% for me.
Most don't have it so bad either with flat screen TVs, Internet, food to eat and a roof over their heads.
The X prize teams are potentially going to do it for <50 million.
Isn't it generally accepted that both will be hugely successful and in the top 5 of all mobile phones sold?
And who benefits anyway? Apple gets more plump AND Google + manufacturers make more money at the same time.
All mobile developers should be developing for both at this stage anyway so it doesn't even affect them who "wins".
Both have already won. The actual title is just a pissing / ego contest by users and bloggers.
Funny thing is that your's and my opinions of where the line should be drawn are irrelevant along with the opinion of sovereign governments' (opinions and related laws). The scientists to do this work will do it anyway and anywhere based on available funding and their personal moral compass.
If one thinks that unique human beings are more important than lab rats that are farmed to be experimented on then it is perfectly moral.
Put another way, if someone in your family had 3rd degree burns to their face and whole upper body and needed new skin. Would you sacrifice a few lab rats to save your family member's life and let them lead a normal life again?
Or would you say, sorry we could have helped you but we couldn't bear to hurt the poor rats to find the solution to your problem?
(and we can replace skin with hearts, liver, kidney, lungs, eyes and any other organ that might be able to be replaced in the future)
Most people that are employed with an average job already own all this stuff no?
Sounds like they had bad legal advice.
So what was the term or terms that screwed them in the end that let the VCs take control?
Sounds like they should have done OK, depending on what % they gave up for their $78MM VC.
Good luck.
There is no excuse really when we have access to the internet and a quick google can tell everything about what drug one is prescribed and about to take (or not take).
Nowhere is God mentioned in this article. Misleading title.
It is highly possible that god doesn't even exist. It is then almost certain that he does not code every living organism's genetic make-up.
Then it goes to pot and turns into some sort of political rant which some point I don't understand.
Also, what BS about worker-less automated factories. Has he even seen high tech factories? They will still need workers for many years to come. And anyway, these factories are more likely to be in the BRIC and other low cost countries still.
A flurry of these factories firstly are not coming to the UK and secondly (if they did) are not likely to bring the UK back to relevancy.
The personal dig about steve's wardrobe was totally un-needed and unclassy.
Steve Jobs has masterminded the most amazing turnaround story probably in history. Have some respect at least. What an idiot this writer is.
A complex internet service with multiple technologies, web, multiple mobile platforms and your valuable IP is another matter and probably not advisable for outsourcing.
5 years is a long time, lots will change in 5 years.
Whether any of them will rival the iPad remains to be seen though.