36 karma · joined June 7, 2007
Since the original article was so vague, and we don't have a particular product to critique, can we at least give Neil the benefit of the doubt? His heart is definitely in the right place (and, in case you're wondering, he's more than just a bit of a geek - he's a first-class geek! - And not too shabby a musician, either...)
Remember: the internet routes around damage.
Upvote = "I'd like to see more comments like this" || "I agree with this".
Downvote = "I'd like to see fewer comments like this" || "I disagree with this".
Those who do not prepare for the coming Singularity are going to be blindsided by it when it arrives.
You kids today are spoiled with multi-GHz machines.
If HN scribd damage occurs on that link, then we will find other ways to route around that damage, for example, by using tinyurl.
Down with scribd!!!
Lets me "print" a PDF to a file - and that's how I converted it to something I can save on my HD and read at my leisure when I'm not online, e.g. when I'm on a plane trip.
This "solution" would not be necessary, however, if scribd and ipaper would go away and never cause any more pain on this planet. I despise ipaper. What were they thinking?
But, you're right: why should I care?
In my opinion, you are just making excuses for why you are less productive than you should be; it's called rationalization. ;-)
My advice is to dive in to some area of s/w (or whatever) that you don't know at all (i.e. become a beginner) and see if that doesn't spark your excitement again. It does for me, over and over again!
The best way to do window focus, tho, is, I think, to have you machine's camera notice where you are looking, and automatically raise that window - iris tracking and window raising.
(aside: the gutless wonders who downvoted my original question did not respond to me directly at yc@culver.net - I suppose those folks are having their teenage fun trying to destroy this community? I have a proposal: whenever any of the "anointed " members of this community downmod anybody, they should be <b>required</b> to provide to the original poster a) their EMAIL ADDRESS so that the poster could respond, and b) their REASON for their action. In addition, I believe that NOBODY should be allowed more downmodding than upmodding - that is, you have to have "upmod points" before you're allowed to downmod - even if you are a Chosen One in the Secret Handshake Society of the YC Cult.)
I'm playing with Arc.
I suppose people who write Microsoft apps may still write C++ but most of them have moved to C#.
Why are people down-voting for asking a simple question? Is THAT what "25 karma" gives them?
This community seems to be getting a little too overcrowded with self-important downvoters. Sad, really. I used to like it here.
There is so incredibly much I could contribute here, but now I ask "why bother" if the community begins its inevitable slide (thanks, Tech Crunch!) into Diggland and Reddithood?