chrisjj

I too am entertained by LLMs.

Morbid fascination.

> I struggle to believe at an intuitive level that autonomous R&D is so ingenious.

Why would anyone go to the effort of struggling?

Thank you Misanthropic for reminding the world you cannot be trusted to organise a piss up in a brewery.

> While no chatbot can ride a bike currently

Let us skip the strawman.

The point is knowledge not ability.

> not a scientific claim

Ain't that the truth.

> it's a colloquial exaggeration

Agreed.

Odd. Claude says it does not.

Each status page update requires preapproval by the PR dept.

> why a JIT wouldn't work

Uh? It would work via a file - as AOT.

> all human knowledge

I know how to ride a bike.

Does your chatbot?

Audit queries do not require control access.

> I still don't see why the expert has to be remote

Because then he can get paid more.

> and in the meantime you can secure software.

... in fantasy land.

> There is zero reason to suggest security is impossible.

One reason: There is zero reason to suggest security is possible.

> Presumably it means much more behavioral security and inherent friction built in to everything we do.

Ironic, after decades of defrictioning.

Intetested to know then why you'd think some are not.

How on earth would anyone think they can cover you?

> who knows maybe the Binance guy actually made a deal to send $5B of crypto for a really cool NFT when drunk

... or when sober.

Someone else's?

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/ledger-crypto-wallets-comp...

Perhaps time to face up to the fact that computers are not a safe place to store crypto.

It is a disclaimer. "We warned you, so you survivors on Luna can't sue us."

And no, they don't control it.

Needs reporting to the RSPCA.

:)

A: Exhaustion.

> I understand the truth is upsetting

To you, for sure.

Your quote fails to corroborate your claim.

> Europe is too busy mandating that every citizen use a Google or Apple phone for digital ID

Total fiction.

Would... and was! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Zen

I did not find pulling the wheel down to push the cursor up to be satisfying.

True title: eMudhra: Private key compromise of Intermediate Certificates

So might be corrected if the agent's output is found not what the programmer intended.

Show us a C UB that went off hacking a website.

And does the "agent" say when the agent's output is not what the programmer intended?

"it remains unclear how the actor acquired exploit information prior to disclosure."