>If you agree its fine, would you apply the same reasoning to [favorite politician]?
What, like Air Force One? https://twitter.com/USAirForceVIP
862 karma · joined March 23, 2013
What, like Air Force One? https://twitter.com/USAirForceVIP
When I read about the problem, I imagined using the mediant to calculate “between”. I think that mediant of $value and 1/1 would work for “after” and mediant of $value and 0/1 would work for “before”.
There must be a requirement I’m missing, though!
mediant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediant_(mathematics)
But if they want you to double it, you’re going to have some bad news to report.
Next, you’ll be telling us that it’s OK for the government to arrest socialists for passing out anti-war flyers.
Remember, what I’m looking for is 114% market penetration. Any help you can provide will be gratefully appreciated.
I admit that this section threw me a little bit for a loop. I mean, I can't assume the author doesn't know this, but this article and the repo give no indication that these are being used properly as rebindable prefixes mapping to namespace declarations. They're not just names-with-colons-in.
In fact, CSS already has syntax for namespaces[0]:
@namespace prefix url(XML-namespace-URL);
/* or */
@namespace prefix "XML-namespace-URL";
/* which is then referenced as */
prefix|element { }
@namespace url(http://www.w3.org/2000/svg);
@namespace xlink url(http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink);
use {
xlink|href: #circle;
}
[0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/@namespace
[1]: https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Change_Proposal_for_ISSUE-120#W...
> Because <number-token>s are always interpreted as <number>s or <integer>s, "unitless 0" <length>s aren’t supported in math functions. That is, width: calc(0 + 5px); is invalid, because it’s trying to add a <number> to a <length>, even though both width: 0; and width: 5px; are valid.
— https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#calc-type-checking
(This also appears in the latest Editor’s Draft.)
I don’t know about websites, but one of Apple’s examples is almost exactly that – “older than 21” – for purchasing alcohol (in the US, yes, yes) without giving over all of the rest of the information on your ID.
> […] authors are encouraged to use values that describe the nature of the content, rather than values that describe the desired presentation of the content.
[*]: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#global-attri...
Never. Or immediately, depending on your perspective. Either way, there’s no need for further paperwork.
> Treaties to which the United States is a party also have the force of federal legislation […]
— https://www.senate.gov/about/powers-procedures/treaties.htm
This behavior is called “Zoom”, and it’s defined per-application by that application. You could change that system-wide to minimize.
> […] when I close a window and then press Cmd+tab, the icon is still there, and if I select it nothing shows up.
Yes, the application hasn’t quit. You’ve only closed its last window.
What on Earth are you talking about?
Of course! I mean, entropy can decrease locally – say, over the entire planet – but that would require some kind of… like, unimaginably large, distant fusion reactor blasting Earth with energy for billions of years.
Now someone tells you, “There’s free speech at Oktoberfest.” Is your first thought that there’s no monetary cost to expression, or that the expression is unencumbered by particular legal restrictions?
(Happily, Oktoberfest has both.)
Think of them as the _slightly_ longer "Free as in 'free beer' " and "Free as in 'free speech' ". When beer is described as “free,” it’s understood to be gratis. When speech is described as free, it’s understood to be libre. These are used as examples for more ambiguous situations, since software can be one, the other, both, or neither.
OK, write the test…
> write a few lines of production code to make it pass
…before the feature.
I recognize the color you’re trying to add (it’s more like TFTFTF than TTTFFF), but it remains Test-Driven Development.
Why is that, do you think?
Test-Driven Development means that the tests are written before the features.
> There should be one – and preferably only one – obvious way to do it.
> Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
No, that’s specified in the JSON Pointer spec, which this spec depends on: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6901
> […] that's not fully specified by just the spec?
Specs depend on previous specs nearly all the time. Thank goodness for hyperlinks.
Oh, right, Quaycloak.
Right, go is for inexperienced programmers.
> The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, they’re not researchers. They’re typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. They’re not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software.
Or so Rob Pike thinks. However, as I get more and more experienced, the shortcomings of go become too much to bear.
If you’re not getting haptic feedback, it is damaged.