Fair enough. Let's define hacking as js-level patching of 3rd generation games :)
Deleting my account now, this is getting ridiculous.
679 karma · joined January 12, 2019
Deleting my account now, this is getting ridiculous.
In the german wikipedia edition 814 mSv/a is mentioned (based on the linked study) for Ramsar, Iran. To be fair, a comment has been added stating:
"Allerdings dürfte bei etwa 33.000 Einwohnern Ramsars die Kohortengröße von weit unter 5 % für die über 100 mSv/a Exponierten wahrscheinlich zu gering sein, um statistisch signifikante Gesundheitsfolgen festzustellen."
Translated: The size of the measured cohort of 33.000 inhabitants of Ramsar of less than 5% for >100 mSv/a exposed participants is probably too small to allow to derive statistically significant health-related conclusions.
https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.2341882 - sorry, just learnt this is not an open access article
https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.5126818 (Oberth Effect)
> during or after a TLS 1.3 handshake
Sure, openSSL is not SSH, but it is not unreasonable to assume this leak may affect web servers as well (e.g. by being based on the same underlying TLS implementation).
"SSH != SSL" is a bit short to invalidate the assumption of the OP. I'd not be so sure this problem does not affect "web server X".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security
OK, learnt something new today: https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/60255/why-doesnt-...
Thanks! :)
You're picking the environment you deem necessary and affordable, and our solution will automatically create appropriate build + deployment scripts for you. We promise no lock-in, generated scripts are downloadable and executable on-premises.
Our working MVP currently supports Java/Gradle based backends and angular / react based frontends. Supported databases are currently PostgreSQL. Supported cloud platforms are currently AWS, Azure to come next.
Roadmap:
* Azure support
* Google cloud support
* .net core backend support
Our own platform runs using our own product. We're searching for a select few alpha customers (lifetime free, incl. support).
If you're interested post a public comment here. No public details will be provided. The planned public alpha launch date will be around September 2020.
Also, it seems to focus on non-diversity ("Elsewhere, campus diversocrats enjoyed similarly enviable mobility while the rest of the country was shutting down", "The frenzied desire to boost “diversity” creates the pretext for much of the bureaucratic bloat. Colleges admit so-called underrepresented minorities (URMs) with academic qualifications far below their white and Asian peers.")
This opens a flank to bullshitters, and in the matter of bullshit they will outperform anyone else, since that's their ground.
In my view of a non-fake-news world, journalists would always (1) provide a link to independent sources where possible.
(1) if possible, i.e. when it doesn't endanger someones life.
In any case, would you please explain to me how you consider the title "The problem of time" being wrong. It appears to me as one of the most fundamental questions in physics. The wikipedia article does - from my PoV - a reasonably good try to explain the problem at hand in laymans terms. It touches the relevant aspects of the problem (no absolute time, time/space interdependency) and expands to a more speculative theory (thermal time hypothesis).
I will not at all claim to have even a basic understanding of the covered topics, despite being an avid reader of related bloggers and papers.
I just am astonished how people disregard work of others even without (basic) knowledge of the domain. Maybe I'm wrong, but noone in this thread even tried to show her/his accomplishments in the mentioned domain.
And thanks for replying without simply downvoting.
And please don't think i automatically included you in the perceived group not having "even a basic understanding o the topic". Maybe you have, but since this is even less recognizable than the merits of the wikipedia author it is - from an outside PoV - even less credible.
Not meant to be snarky, and in general imho it is good the be critical always - but this should include oneself. The latter part is often lacking, and the amount of lacking very often appears to be proportional to the lack of knowledge of the commentator.
What needs to happen that we humans start to think?
If you expect a significant percentage of the population to be infected, wearing a mask significantly reduces the infection rate of others (as demonstrated by all asian countries).
By reducing the reproduction factor (which causes the exponential increase ignoring people having developed resistance), it also reduces strain on health workers.
And if you're able to grasp how and why this is so, it even reduces the infection risk for yourself.
Imagine the person at your workplace, who is liked by most people. Is that the person which is most capable of deciding what should happen to steer the community as a whole?
Most probably not.
Einstein was right :)
Just one small thing to consider: if even one person of google was a federal agent (of an offending country). Fill the missing parts of the sentence.
And yes, as much as I despise the EU in its current form, that's the intention of GDPR: to prevent spilling personal data into a pool of people with potentially malignant actors, and, if this happens, to be responsible to full disclosure.
@dantheman: I guess you still won't be considered to be hired by google for this post.
* google appears to make all of our data available to most of its developers
* we complain that brave wants to boost its reputation
wtf, seriously, wtf?
I mean, granted, brave sucks and wants to have an easy buy-in to some folks, but still: what's hiding behind this is huge.
If I were google I'd buy brave for this kind of burying.
E.g. https://www.translatetheweb.com/?ref=TVert&from=&to=en&a=Cor...
E.g.:
2020-03-14: 0.0019%
2020-03-21: 0.02% ( = 0.0019% * (1,4 ^ 7))
2020-03-28: 0.21% ( = 0.21% * (1,4 ^ 7))
2020-04-03: 2.22% ( = 2.22% * (1,4 ^ 7))
2020-04-10: 23.43% ( = 23.43% * (1,4 ^ 7))
etc.
(Assuming a constant daily growth rate of 40%, which will probably decrease due to deaths of hosts).
=
"The corona virus inflicts panic and hoarding. But will we profit from Covid-19 in the end?"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22550623
Now this post has inevitably been downranked as well. I'm setting up a HN downranking-watch site right now ;-)
If you know some crowd-funding site where one can donate money to health care workers, please let me know (berthold dot alexander at googlemail dot com)
I live in germany and currently it seems we're approaching that. The US still seems to be in denial.
That's averaged, of course. If your refrigerator breaks, your individual value will increase. But as a whole, it will still decrease.