255 karma · joined September 14, 2019
Training is (if your understand the content) not so stressful as working in consulting or developing, and you meet a lot of interesting people.
It comes with its own burden, of course, but it may work as a way to find time to better understand what you want to do in the future.
Also, the salary is pretty good.
[1] https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/audio-monitor.1186/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhXaC1f9QwQ
(edited to correct the format, I hope)
The set of skills is very different from the list you are presenting. Endurance is one of them, and I think older people will have more of that than younger ones.
Maybe we all have been living in the tech bubble for so much time that we can even forget the fact we are part of a much more diverse world. It happens to me, for sure.
Also, the language has clear defects, but they irritate much more the experienced folks than the rookies (that are not so surprised when encountering inconsistencies).
Oh, and I have also trained many people using Java, and I initiated my dev career with Java 0.99 (or 0.98?). Most of my courses started with the sentence "let me tell you a joke: public static void main(String[] args)" :)
edited for correcting my English.
https://www.newsweek.com/facebook-tracking-you-even-if-you-d...
I've been delivering training in a similar way for a few months and the experience (as trainer!) has improved a lot because I'm able to keep a much more direct contact with the students.
And a remarkable point (I think) is that you are not limited to 5-10 fps provided by the shared screen feature: the transitions between slides becomes much more natural, less clunky.
I really think delivering good remote training is very complex as we need to learnt new tricks (and forget some old ones). And, in the end, is the sum of many little small improvements like this one what can make the experience a success.
Edited, to correct a bit my poor English ;-)
Ironically, the country itself was at that time well-known for its opaque finantial practices.
The presenter ability for arranging the interface options for the session may look like a good idea when you think about it until you realize everybody wants to take their approach for it (different styles, different monitors, or even different priorities depending if the chat is being used or the interaction is done with the cameras).
Overall, I prefer any other tool (and I've also used zoom, teams, chime, and jitsi).