You created it in minutes, I think the appropriate next step would be to ask another LLM to try to poke holes in it. It does not seem fair to ask security professionals to waste their time on this.
It doesn't run a similar prompt or the same prompt again and hopes for the best. If it doesn't work, the agent debugs based on the errors received. Have you tried using a coding agent recently?
The US admin says they're going to take Greenland one way or the other and finds out this can have short- and longterm consequences. In other news, water is wet. I don't think I have ever seen a dumber geopolitical play than that in my lifetime.
Your argument is guilt by association. Association with something that isn't morally wrong, it's just a way to try to spend money on charity in an effective way? You can take a lot of ideas too far and end up with a bad result of course.
You're not allowed to drive cars like that in a functional society. When you go for your compulsory car checkup it wouldn't pass the required safety standards.
"Withdrawal Clause: Countries may withdraw with three months' notice if "extraordinary events" jeopardize their supreme interests. "
Doesn't seem that hard to leave it.
You're right they usually do this, I checked some press release from last year. The big difference is that it's now the CEO that had to write the blurb instead of (e.g.) a vice president of product.