2000:1::1 would expand to 2000:0001:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
2000::1::1 could be 2000:0000:0000:0000:0001:0000:0000:001, or 2000:00000000:0001:0000:0000:0000:001
There's ambiguity on where to fill in the five groups of 0000 in the second case.
62 karma · joined July 20, 2018
2000::1::1 could be 2000:0000:0000:0000:0001:0000:0000:001, or 2000:00000000:0001:0000:0000:0000:001
There's ambiguity on where to fill in the five groups of 0000 in the second case.
Users can slowly adapt, but most businesses larger than a sole proprietorship need multiuser capability.
https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/26/17166272/foxconn-buys-bel...
Give Philips a try? May just be worth the premium. Hopefully a standard like the one mentioned in a comment below is put into place.