412 karma · joined April 20, 2007
Is it possible to have anonymity, security and generally-usable accessibility? Not necessarily speed -- latency can be acceptable when the user isn't stuck waiting in real time on a spinning circular icon.
Engineers being engineers, someone analyzed the log data and discovered that the skin resistance of female workers tended to vary on a monthly cycle, and you could predict these cycles based on empirical data. This soon spread around the office.
At some point HR got involved and shut it down. The ohmmeter was replaced with a red/green light.
This application has failed to start because MSVCR100.dll was not found. Re-installing the application may fix this problem.
Update: Couldn't figure out how to use it on my 64-bit Ubuntu VM.
I'm curious about this, because I develop Eclipse RCP apps, and I've wondered before about making a stripped down ultralight JDT.
I love Eclipse, but I understand it's overkill for many, and it forces a lot of strange jargon on you all at once (working sets? perspectives? wtf?). The concepts make sense once you bend your mind to the Eclipse model, but is there an easier, more natural model?
Eclipse reminds me of the old Mozilla kitchen sink -- we need a Firefox, I mean a Chrome.
Distance yourself by connecting client & courier directly with a distributed P2P app (like Tor), and sell the authenticity and financial escrow services. Keep no knowledge or record of the actual transactions.
Yes, unless we figure out the knowledge required to synthesize these elements, recapture them, or develop substitutes.
Knowledge has a habit of disrupting what otherwise looks like a zero-sum game.
Something like the Eclipse RCP mail app demo could provide a more representative baseline memory footprint of the platform (http://www.eclipse.org/articles/Article-RCP-3/tutorial3.html). The Eclipse platform can be quite compact without the IDE features, JDT & online help indexing, etc.
Really? Where? Is that in USD?
Telling developers which languages to use? Might as well stick with enterprise software development, more innovation going on over there Apple!
Because of licensing issues, Eclipse.org won't host the plugins you need to install Subversion support in the IDE. Recent releases of Subversive try to remedy this with a pop-up dialog to download & install the connector plugin when you first try to connect to a repository, but it's a different process, it looks and feels different to the user than normal feature installation, and if it fails for some reason, you'll have to start googling.
The smaller members of the Eclipse community should be able to manage their own IP risk without having to adopt the extremely conservative risk tolerance of IBM, government agencies, very large companies, etc. I think there is definitely a need to support the conservatives, but it shouldn't be at the expense of innovators and early adopters.
How can a community strike this kind of balance?
How does one cultivate this empathy?