cmdlinecowboy

RHEL 10 beta has some interesting stuff in it. Running the OS itself as a container caught my eye.

As someone with a spare receipt printer and studying for a private pilots license……genius

The most horrible bit about Microsoft is that pesky release of new mandated security features! My windows 7 has everything just the way I like it /s

your characterization of red hat makes sense from where it sounds like you’re coming from but you miss the mark a bit I feel

RHEL isn’t meant for the everyday developer and red hat does a lousy job enabling them. Ubuntu and Debian do a much better job as is proven by the wide availability of developer tools on Ubuntu/Debian.

But look at the enterprise software market share, of which red hat focuses on entirely — canonical has a sub 5% market share for enterprise Linux or something pathetic along those lines while RHEL is over 85% or something close. Canonical has done the opposite by catering to workstations and developers and have done exquisite things with their workstations but their real enterprise servers suck.

SElinux isn’t meant to just run static on your box while you’re using it to everyday browse or develop that’d be brutal. It’s meant to secure an application or files with predefined egress based on business logic.

Now on the other hand, fedora— it’s upstream my man. Frequent releases is… the point? it’s community based upstream development if you’re looking for the latest features it’s perfect but you’re also getting the latest bugs.

Ubuntu sounds appropriate for you! That doesn’t mean RHEL or fedora “has reached peak complexity”

If you wanted RHEL or Cent/Rocky/Alma:

- disable selinux on your home or personal workstation. you can get granular with how to do it too if you choose. - automate your patching it takes 5 minutes one time - if you want RHEL benefits with Fedora-adjacent (but not as buggy) releases you’re describing what is now CentOS Stream which is also a rolling-release distro

I felt similar to you last year but my company uses RHEL and we just did some worth while quick training. When explained in ways that make sense, it makes sense. Unfortunately I think red hat has been lackluster several times over on how to say what I just said

edit: meant to add that I hope this helps!

Hannah Montana Linux

Just use Rocky Linux or Alma Linux it’s basically what Cent was. Unless you’re running anything super insanely mission critical CentOS stream would still be fine for your uses, and if you need something THAT highly available support might be worth while anyways in an enterprise environment.

Red Hat for enterprise use, Fedora for personal desktop use. One of the largest communities you’ll find. If you want Debian based maybe just straight Debian.

The centos debacle was poorly handled but I think what red hat was /trying/ to do made sense. The community just wasn’t there to sustain it. Red Hat was paying to give away free RHEL basically lol. CentOS Stream should have just been called RHEL Stream. It’s basically RHEL minus minor bugs that would only effect small pools of people.

I’m glad Rocky and Alma sprung up and have budding communities though.

I use openshift at work, it’s way way more than k8s with batteries. It has downstream, secured, stable versions of open source projects built into one supported product. I see what you mean though.