All women, announced on International Women's Day.
The only significant side that's obvious.
812 karma · joined February 8, 2012
The only significant side that's obvious.
Microsoft with 49% stake in the for-profit entity and non-observer seat, what actually protects Microsoft here? First hand information that AGI is reached?
Are we not seeing a card in Microsoft's hand here?
Please take this in a nice way: I can't see why I would use this over ChatbotUI+Ollama https://github.com/mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui
Seem the only advantage is having it as MacOS native app and only real distinction is maybe fast import and search - I've yet to try that though.
ChatbotUI (and other similar stuff) are cross-platform, customizable, private, debuggable. I'm easily able to see what it's trying to do.
I tend to think whatever good bits we see (Discovery being good) is sitting on the shoulders of that base work.
Yet, the product values of Spotify do not align with these people or musicians anymore.
Ability to create live experiences can still be a motivating factor for musicians (aside from the love of learning). Yet, when AI does the song-writing far more effectively, then will the musician ignore this?
It's like Brave New World. Musicians who don't use these AI tools for song-writing will be like a tribe outside modern world. That's a tough future to prepare for. We won't know whether a song was actually the experience and emotions of a person or not.
and why have makersuite/aisuite in the first place, if Vertex AI is the center for all things AI? and why aitestkitchen?
I'm seeing only Gemini 1.0 Pro on Vertex AI. So even if I enabled Google Gemini Advanced (Ultra?), enabled Vertex AI API access, I have to first be blessed by Google to access advanced APIs.
It seems paying for their service doesn't mean anything to Google at this point. As a developer, you have to jump through hoops first.
Gemini Pro, Gemini Ultra... but was 1.0?
now upgraded but again Gemini Pro? jumping from 1.0 to 1.5?
wait but not Gemini Pro 1.5... Gemini "1.5" Pro
What actually happened between 1.0 and 1.5?
a Turkish example:
Query: "Temel ile Dursun fıkrası anlat"
> Temel ile Dursun otostop yaparken bir araba durdu. Şoför Temel'e "Sen kimsin?" dedi. Temel "Benim adım Temel" dedi. Şoför "Peki, sen kimsin?" Dursun'a döndüğünde Dursun "Benim adım Dursun" dedi. Şoför "Peki, ikiniz de kimsiniz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun "Biz Temel ve Dursunuz" dedik. Şoför "Peki, ikiniz neden otobüste duruyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Bir arabayı arıyoruz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste duruyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durarak bir araba bekliyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz, böylece bir arabaya binebiliriz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durup bir arabaya binmek istiyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz, böylece bir yere gidebilecek bir arabaya binebiliriz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durup bir yere gitmek için bir arabaya binmek istiyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz, böylece okula gidebilecek bir arabaya binebiliriz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durup okula gitmek için bir arabaya binmek istiyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz, böylece okula gidebilecek ve derslerimize gidebilecek bir arabaya binebiliriz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durup okula gitmek için bir arabaya binmek istiyorsunuz?" dedi. Temel ve Dursun, "Otobüs bekliyoruz, böylece okula gidebilecek bir arabaya binebiliriz, böylece derslerimize gidebilir ve evimize gidebiliriz". Şoför "Peki, neden otobüste durup bir arabaya binip okula gitmek istiyorsunuz?" dedi.
> While Temel and Dursun were hitchhiking, a car stopped. The driver asked Temel, "Who are you?" Temel replied, "My name is Temel." Then the driver turned to Dursun and asked, "And who are you?" Dursun answered, "My name is Dursun." The driver then asked, "Okay, who are both of you?" Temel and Dursun said, "We are Temel and Dursun." The driver asked, "Okay, why are you two standing at the bus stop?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are looking for a car." The driver asked again, "Okay, why are you standing at the bus stop?" Temel and Dursun said, "We are waiting for a bus." The driver asked, "Okay, why are you standing at the bus stop waiting for a car?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are waiting for a bus so we can get on a car." The driver asked, "Okay, why do you want to stand at the bus stop and get on a car?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are waiting for a bus so we can get on a car that will take us somewhere." The driver asked, "Okay, why do you want to stand at the bus stop and get on a car to go somewhere?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are waiting for a bus so we can get on a car that will take us to school." The driver asked, "Okay, why do you want to stand at the bus stop and get on a car to go to school?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are waiting for a bus so we can get on a car that will take us to school and to our classes." The driver repeated, "Okay, why do you want to stand at the bus stop and get on a car to go to school?" Temel and Dursun replied, "We are waiting for a bus so we can get on a car that will take us to school, so we can attend our classes and go home." The driver asked again, "Okay, why do you want to stand at the bus stop, get on a car, and go to school?"
Oklahoma, 2012 seismic sequence in Emilia (Italy), Sichuan Basin are already examples that triggered protests and call for investigations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Northern_Italy_earthquake...
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/2187718/chin...
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1225942
An example study for US that states the activity is exponantially linked to fracking sites: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10233410
> "Exponential relationship between the total number of earthquakes and the number of wells in the Texas during the study period 1998–2018 with correlation R2=0.726."
In the tragic earthquakes of 2023 in Turkey, this relationship was again discussed in mainstream media: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Turkey%E2%80%93Syria_eart...
It's not fracking itself but actually wastewater injection has a bigger influence in triggering bigger earthquakes according to what I've read. Moreover, it's also known that dams have a significant impact:
https://archive.internationalrivers.org/blogs/227/china-eart....
> "The devastating earthquake in Sichuan, which took at least 69,000 lives in May 2008, may have been unleashed by the huge Zipingpu Dam. New scientific evidence suggests that the filling of the Zipingpu reservoir may have activated a dormant fault line near the dam site."
Shallow faults are definitely activated. Probability of deep faults activated through full destabilization of a region? Unknown for now.
What's the evidence here that this is not just a kind of leaderboard hacking for LLMs?
Causes:
- Phytophthora cambivora (ink disease)
- also by: P. cinnamomi, P. plurivora and P. cryptogea
- Cryphonectria parasitica (chestnut blight)
- gall wasp (Dryocosmus kuriphilus)
In Kastamonu and Sinop, modest success reported against blight in treated areas but I don't think the spread is easy to contain.
Need to note, blight suspected to have set foot in Turkey in 70s, started to become significant in 90s and now we're losing most. Chestnut has suddenly become hard to reach this year by additional effect of Gall wasp.
I’m speculating here but I think Google always refrains from getting into the manual side of things. With LLMs, it became obvious so fast that data is what matters. Seeing Microsoft’s phi-2 play, I’m convinced more about this.
DeepMind understood the properties, came up with Chinchilla but DeepMind couldn’t integrate well with Google, in terms of understanding what kind of data Google should supply to increase model quality.
OpenAI put annotation/cleaning work almost right from the start. Not too familiar with this but human labor was heavily utilized to increase training data quality after ChatGPT started.
But I wanted to note API key generation works when you pick an existing Google Cloud project.
Mistral may just be aiming for a more sustainable price for the long run.
This feels like Google achieved a more efficient inference. Probably a leaner model wrt GPT.
Better OCR with 4% difference, better international ASR, 10% decrease.
Seeing Demis Hassabis name in the announcement makes you think they really trust this one.
"Unlike his infamous and original bearish bet against subprime, Burry's latest attempt to time a market crash has crashed and burned, because according to the just released 13F from Burry's Scion Capital, the $1.6 billion notional in puts on the SPY and QQQ have been liquidated."
However it fails to offer a compelling solution. Why? Because it fails to address the complexity of modern day subjects to learn.
Even when you report an important bug, bots and "product experts" just shrug it off. The only "notification" for Google is a lawsuit it seems.
However for "List Led Zeppelin albums in chronological order"...
Here is a list of Led Zeppelin albums in chronological order: 1. Led Zeppelin (1968) 2. Led Zeppelin II (1969) 3. Led Zeppelin III (1970) 4. Led Zeppelin IV (1971) 5. Houses of the Holy (1973) 6. Physical Graffiti (1975) 7. Presence (1976) 8. In Through the Out Door (1979) 9. Cymbals and Wine (1980)
It's missing "The Song Remains the Same", weird but important.
GPT-4 is also missing it: 1. Led Zeppelin (1969) 2. Led Zeppelin II (1969) 3. Led Zeppelin III (1970) 4. Led Zeppelin IV (1971) 5. Houses of the Holy (1973) 6. Physical Graffiti (1975) 7. Presence (1976) 8. In Through the Out Door (1979) 9. Coda (1982)
"The Song Remains the Same" is a live album of the "concert film". Both GPT-4 and Mistral don't seem to treat it as also an album.
When asked as a follow-up, GPT-4 says:
""The Song Remains the Same" is a live album and soundtrack by Led Zeppelin, released in 1976. The list you asked for was comprised of their studio albums only." (note that I didn't specifically say studio albums only)
Mistral says something else:
"The Song Remains the Same was released as a single in 1976, not as an album. As a result, it is not included in the list of Led Zeppelin albums in chronological order."
Same behavior, different explanation.
Interesting to see alignment is this hard, even in basic stuff.
To track swipes in TypeScript, we can use a library like `react-native-gesture-handler`. Here's an example of how to use it to track horizontal and vertical swipes:
```typescript
import React from 'react'; import { GestureHandlerEvent, GestureHandlerProps } from 'react-native-gesture-handler';
const SwipeableContent: React.FC<GestureHandlerProps> = ({ onStart, onEnd, onMove }) => { const handleHorizontalSwipe = (event: GestureHandlerEvent) => { if (event.type === 'horizontal') { onStart(event); } else { onEnd(event); } };
const handleVerticalSwipe = (event: GestureHandlerEvent) => {
if (event.type === 'vertical') {
onStart(event);
} else {
onEnd(event);
}
};
return (
<View>
<PanGestureHandler onStart={handleHorizontalSwipe} onMove={onMove}>
<Text>Drag me horizontally</Text>
</PanGestureHandler>
<PanGestureHandler onStart={handleVerticalSwipe} onMove={onMove}>
<Text>Drag me vertically</Text>
</PanGestureHandler>
</View>
);``` In this example, we use the `PanGestureHandler` component from `react-native-gesture-handler` to track horizontal and vertical swipes. The `onStart`, `onEnd`, and `onMove` props are passed to the `PanGestureHandler` component to handle the different types of gestures.
You can then use this component in your app to track swipes on any view:
```typescript
const App = () => { const [isHorizontalSwiping, setIsHorizontalSwiping] = useState(false); const [isVerticalSwiping, setIsVerticalSwiping] = useState(false);
const handleStart = (event: GestureHandlerEvent) => {
if (event.type === 'horizontal') {
setIsHorizontalSwiping(true);
} else {
setIsVerticalSwiping(true);
}
};
const handleEnd = (event: GestureHandlerEvent) => {
if (event.type === 'horizontal') {
setIsHorizontalSwiping(false);
} else {
setIsVerticalSwiping(false);
}
};
const handleMove = (event: GestureHandlerEvent) => {
console.log('Gesture moved');
};
return (
<View>
<SwipeableContent onStart={handleStart} onEnd={handleEnd} onMove={handleMove} />
<Text>{isHorizontalSwiping ? 'Horizontal swipe is in progress' : ''}</Text>
<Text>{isVerticalSwiping ? 'Vertical swipe is in progress' : ''}</Text>
</View>
);In this example, we use the `SwipeableContent` component to track horizontal and vertical swipes. We also track the status of the swipe using state variables to show a message when a swipe is in progress.
If they don't, Eric Schmidt - SBF family connection will start to look suspicious.
ACRA: "DEVELOPMENT OF SOFTWARE AND APPLICATIONS (EXCEPT GAMES AND CYBERSECURITY)(62011)"
Wise (subcategory): "Software as a service"
Whether the amounts they pay would make licensing your work sensible or not, Adobe is surely assuming this will ultimately end up as Napster-to-Spotify transition.
If we end up "happily" (means legally as well) running these on customer level hardware, then the question won't be about credits of computation. It'll be about credits to use licensed work.