265 karma · joined October 25, 2014
Are there any other smaller SSH clients out there?
How much of this article do you think would apply to something like that? e.g. something like 'wait a second (or even two!) between successive hits' might not be necessary (one could perhaps shorten it to 1/4 second) if one is only doing a few requests followed by long periods of no requests.
3DOF?
I know the DEC VT340 was capable of 132 columns, as was an Apple II with a Videx Ultraterm card and a suitable (hi-res) monitor.
There are probably even more examples, but those two are what came to mind first.
Or just put your machine in a bank vault.
So, if I print it out on paper and give it to a colleague, that's copyright infringement?
What about if the page no longer exists and it got archived on the Internet Archive? Is accessing that copy a violation of copyright?
There is also a 16 bit version: http://www.s100computers.com/My%20System%20Pages/VGA_16_Boar...
These did used to exist. They were called 120x60 px buttons.
http://nuttx.incubator.apache.org/docs/latest/applications/n...
for other interested parties:
http://www.a2heaven.com/webshop/index.php?rt=product/product...
I'm sorry you're bothered by my comment; it's simply an expression of how I feel.
> PICO-8 is one of the most vibrant communities in existence for beginners making games. Thousands of people have made thousands of games with this software....licensing allows people who purchase the engine to distribute it in their own games.
Windows is also very popular, and it is also proprietary software. It enables lots of other people's jobs to exist, but that doesn't mean that it's ethical to deprive its users of the source code to the software that's running on their machine.
>The price point to purchase is extremely cheap, supports the person that created it...
I don't have a problem with donating money to help out a project; I have a problem with the software not respecting the four freedoms (liberties) of free software. (https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html)
> It is one of the most open, empowering, user-supporting pieces of software...
It isn't open and it isn't user-supporting or empowering. Users don't have access to the source code, and in that way the developer holds power over the users. Bruce Perens, who really popularized the idea of 'open source' once said "When I say 'Open Source', I mean the same thing that Richard means when he says 'Free Software'."
> there are plenty of open-source projects that are actively user-hostile.
would you like to provide some specific examples?
> aren't saying that out of any interest for how that would make the project better or create a better community, but instead are saying it from a standpoint that only considers how it would benefit them personally.
A better community would be able to improve the software itself with access to the source code. Also, simply because it-being-libre-software would benefit me personally doesn't mean it wouldn't also benefit the rest of the community equally as much.