The way to read this is:
- they think the restriction is necessary;
- they have considered whether the said rights outweigh the need for the restriction, and believe they do not.
1,465 karma · joined October 12, 2010
- they think the restriction is necessary;
- they have considered whether the said rights outweigh the need for the restriction, and believe they do not.
Again, this is a different problem. One can imagine a service with a seignorage fee to verify such things when an NFT is minted after which that particular question is settled. The point of it being on a blockchain would then be subsequent ease of sale, transfer etc.
Iirc cdpa 1988 in the UK holds it to be copyright of the authors of the program. But I'd be surprised if the law was a comfortable fit for practice 30 years on, or that it had been tested much in court.
Dubious.
The weird thing was that to anyone following ML this was detectable bs.
Then some textbooks with exercises (e.g. Axler on lin alg).
The notation is usually an expression of a mental model, so just approaching via notation may cause some degree of confusion.
Tfw learning a new perspective every day :)
But then we need to conduct the debate on the basis of different cryptos requiring different policy. Rather than saying crypto->criminal.
Pseudonymously. Cash in a bag is anonymous and very widely used by criminals.
The other big difference is with the public ledger currencies the whole transaction history is visible, including to the authorities. Which is considerably more transparent than the current financial system with shell companies, tax havens etc etc.
If you're familiar with this, why reiterate the old canard?
I'd suggest you think very carefully about this first. There's a very high chance the stealth mode work will be non-useful for getting onto a programme. Similar to how working on a 'build it and they will come' approach is generally disadvised for startups. Obviously it depends on how much of a lone genius you are but only you know that ;)
You really can't at good universities in the UK. At Cambridge we had to get special permission to live more than 10 miles from Great St Mary's. My advisor's advice was that it was near impossible to finish up while working.
Had enough of Americans telling me about their excruciatingly long PhD programmes when half of that time is spent teaching and doing exams which we'd probably call an MSc. Or half of a post-doc position.
3-4 years is a great length of time for a contract where you're subject to such a power imbalance.
On the criticism, do you think more limited / lab-bound systems will help develop control technology in advance of better muscles?
Only if you do it wrong, generally. Events which are impossible under some hypothesis should have zero probability under a model for it and not be sampled.
Per the Wason selection task this is a great experiment to run, because if it isn't true then that's strong evidence many more complex theories relating to sync are likely to be false.
This is just not true. Senior dev at non FAANG could well add 50% to those numbers.