Service is otherwise easy to use and looks nice.
812 karma · joined May 8, 2008
Service is otherwise easy to use and looks nice.
No Remote but with relocate.
One of the top 25 most trafficked sites in the US, lots of cool projects going on. Well funded and profitable. Still startup minded.
Looking for people with Android, iPhone, Flash, PHP, and Python backgrounds.
Drop me an email if you'd like to talk: gmr@myyearbook.com
I find that the most of spam that I get on paste site I run is deplorable link spam for illegal content. I'm not talking about warez or torrent links either. I ended up having to write a filtering to look for keywords and url to content analysis and then submit content that triggers the filter to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Best of luck.
When asking for a performance benchmark, specifically about systems that are very dependent on communication protocol for performance, I think that it's more valuable to know how the best performing protocol of either side would perform.
As far as atomic vs CAS, I'd be more interested in the "right way" than the same way, so for my own interest, yes.
Re: Ratio, from your graph it appeared they were co-mingled. If each was done on their own then my point is moot.
Also, one should not expect to see parity in get/set ratios or you're doing it wrong. Cache get with a good hit ratio/high effectiveness is the point of memcached. While memcached gets effectively plateaued in his low concurrency example, redis get performance degraded as you added more clients/concurrency. In an unoptimized use of memcached, high transaction rate environment, I see sets at 10% of gets.
Redis may very well be faster, but an effective benchmark should be closer to real world use case and shouldn't hold one party back for parity in protocol complexity.
They work together to make for happy master-slave replication.
It's worth noting this is database server level. Hot-standby copies 100% of a PostgreSQL instance. If you want to replicate individual databases on a server or individual tables in a database, Longdiste, Bucardo or Slony are still the way to go.
The reason most replication systems sit outside of PostgreSQL are there are many different use cases for replication and no one method is going to get it right enough to complicate the core code. There are efforts underway to create a common structure to base replication on so that projects like Bucardo, Slony and Londiste can more easily and reliably plug into the core database engine for replication.
A good example of a Microsoft centric view of the web is when I was lobbied by Microsoft to add IE8 specific code for enhanced IE8 specific functionality to my site. "Other browsers will just ignore the tags" was the reply to my question about cross-browser compatibility. This is a wrong-headed view of the Internet. Make open standards that are valuable enough for everyone to adopt and lead in that area. IE8 only functionality doesn't help anyone but people who will only ever service IE8 users.
Their adoption of jQuery for use in their tools and participation in the community is a good example of where they are doing what I am advocating. Silverlight, on the other hand is an example of a Microsoft only view of the web.
I find my very smart, very talented Microsoft focused web developer friends are often late to the latest trends in web development because they're so focused on what Microsoft is doing and not where the Internet in general is going. I'm sure this is not representative of everyone who is a Microsoft focused developer, but it does seem to be a case with a majority of people I speak with in that area.
http://trydiaspora.com http://openspora.com
Any others?
For comparison I found Muse had a stream on Ping so I checked it compared to their Twitter account. Ping's stream for them was sanitized and small. It was not personal and I assume it didn't tell me anything other than what the label wanted me to know.
With full access to my very large library including many albums purchased in ITMS, they suggested a series of artists I have no interest in.
Activity is only measured by what you purchase or review in the ITMS, not on what I actually do in iTunes. They have an opportunity to steal everyones lunch with Ping. Mirroring last.fm functionality with scrobbling and then presenting that info in the profile is a no-brainer.
When looking at my profile, I noticed that the two things it pointed as were two reviews I made in iTunes from years ago. Fresh content is king.
The interface is terrible. Navigating around Ping is a mess.
Granted this is a 1.0, but they have a lot of work to do if they want it to get serious traction and they need to loosen the content reigns a bit. Waiting for my profile pic to be approved is silly.
That statement is in agreement with the graph.
The admin UI is nice, real time stats are good. It, however is still in the 2nd beta and there are known bugs that need to be fixed to be considered production worthy imo.
Ultimately for me it feels better to read on the Kindle. The Kindle is made for reading and it shows in the engineering, just as the iPad is a multimedia device that has a few apps for reading books.
Unfortunately the bamboo curls outward in essence making the shape that of |( where the pipe is the iPad and the parenthesis is the DodoCase.
I've sent a request for some sort of reasonable way to fix this, as it's been this way since I've received it. The reply was they would send me new rubber feet and it's doing what bamboo does naturally. I stopped using it the day my iPad slipped out of the case and hit concrete on the corner making a nice nasty dent.
You might want to refocus it as a trend or search type app. If you can out trend twitter trends by picking up on context and not just tags, I think you'd really have something.