cramer4next

Not at all. Let me quote the OP from above,

>> No seriously, where's the leeway in interpretation? I truly don't see it.

The point is I can grab any verse and sell it for whatever my narrative is. The fact is the OP wants it interpreted the way they read it. I don't see any connection forcing someone to dispose of wealth to be part of a religion.

Extreme wealth has nothing to do beliefs or your religion. What the theme here is that to be a devote X you need to follow every rule and belief to claim yourself an X. Thats nonsense and anyone who did would carry the label of religious fanatic. 99 percent of all religious people do not follow or believe 100 percent of whatever their following.

Then I guess you've never seen religion being weaponized or being used as excuss to be non-inclusive? Or is that a truly wrong interpretation?

Also when your not polorized it affords you to be a critical thinker. E.g. Understanding why people say what they say instead of just hearing what they say.

Can you shed some light of childhood in the church? Sounds like you have some experience in what your claiming.

Sounds like that can be interpreted in many different ways. Isn't this why we are here?

Not sure where your getting that Christians can't be wealthy or accumulate wealth. Theres nothing is Christen teachings that says you must give away your wealth. Historically and currently there are many Christians that have vast amounts of wealth.

I'm not sure about the elitist funding or the human grading. Please give a source on this along with the exact biblical text that contradicts his actions.

Can you exapnd on this? Especially on the specifics to what you think those actions are and how their against/anti Protestant or Catholic beliefs.

E.g. I think what your getting at is something akin to, "you can't be Catholic if you are for abortion".

Spot on. Thats really interesting. Especially the subscription revenue. Never knew they had that. Thanks for providing a link to that! I got some research to do.

I did not know this. Can you expand on it? When I was on Roku channel it looked like it was all free. I didn't watch long enough to notice if it had advertising embeded in it. If it is ad supported your telling me after distribution costs their advertising network brings in 1b+?

Ok. But I really wouldn't trust numbers coming from the same company that produces them. A better gauge would be Nielsen. Roku doesn't even show in the top 10.

https://www.nielsen.com/data-center/top-ten/

Personally I've had Roku from the beginning and never once saw or watched the Roku Channel. But I did look it up now. Looks like all "D" rated films and really old media. They produce nothing and licence and syndicate everything.

Roku isn't a media company. They make hardware and license software.

For one that deal hasn't closed and secondly not sure what the connection is between Roku leaving Github and FOX. Please expand on relevance.

I concur. Everything is such a hard left turn.

The reality is what ever better and cheaper is where the money flows. Especially from an international corporation perspective.

It just seemed like a magical place from the founders hindsight on streaming, the technology scale for which they operate at, and the connection to making movies and tv shows. Kinda like a fairy tale dream stack for me.

Out of all the tech companies, Netflix was the one company I really wanted to work for one day. Over the years I've applied for dozen roles and never once did I ever hear anything back from them.

Since you didn't state which futures, I will assume it was the Canadian and Russians futures. And your spot on those markets do lie.

At least in the U.S. they we're spot on predicting Trump's victory 2022 & 2016, and congressional control. 2020 predicted the loss.

If your willing to share how you read futures markets for predicting elections I'd love to hear it.

>> and it almost certainly will

I would love to know where you got this analysis from. Hopefully not from polling or CNN. I think we all learned a lesson from using those data points.

The best indicator for this is the futures market. It never lies.

This is exactly how you end up with AI slop. If all you do is command AI to do things without understanding anything the result is always the same.

How am I being dismissive? I simply stated two things around the discussion of "bubble" and "reality". I made no opinion or view, rather I defined bubble and stated the reality of what war really is.

Nothing I said is about whats wrong or right. I simply pointed out historical facts. The same way the original comment I replied to.

Innocent people everyday are victims in a system they have absolutely no control over. Especially in cases of war and international affairs. None of these statements reflect any of my personal feelings or passing a judgement on any grouping of people.

I'm still confused how this has anything to do with a noble prize?

Secondly did you ever watch the aftermath of the U.S dropping atomic bombs on Japan? How many children were killed? How many innocent people suffered? Thats the "reality" of war.

Not from my perspective. Being in bubble means your lacking experience and living a sheltered life. Reality is subjective to ones view.

The system is abusive in the fact it of what industry and the people they target for the program.

As a business owner their is no shame in finding the right person to do the job at the cheapest rate by leveraging a legal government program.

Next your going to shame people who can afford a fast pass a theme park because they can afford to do so. Insane.

The U.S. will always dominate because they consume everything and make really nothing. The second people in U.S. stop consuming everyone else pays the price.

So then given your use of "martyr" and your focus on money, your good with poor uneducated people sacrificing themselves and others for a self-serving cause?

Yes. Many cases of the "preach being the cover for the sin".

I'm in full agreement. So many cases of this, and many other others such as falling out with management and peers, new more lucrative offer, and so fourth. Its obvious that these people who come forward are not going to suffer for their new found moral compass.

Not a dup. Different source and perspective.

This isn't a dup. Different perspective and source.

I think it does when you don't see the same level of rage when its exactly the same thing. Its called polorization. If you accepted it the first time you've all ready approved it universally.

I work for a proprietary trading firm that creates markets and liquidity for U.S. based exchanges. Given our relience on AI now on decision making and identifying opportunities we can't afford to use solutions deemed a threat to any of our supply chains. What happens when Claude says you've earned too much money and I'm not going to do that? Straight up insanity.