2,777 karma · joined November 21, 2012
<https://gotform.co.uk>
<https://thepeopleschamber.co.uk>
About three years in a row now she's tried to get lawn seed and poured a load of cheap weed and feed on instead. Completely going overboard on the quantities for good measure. At this point I'm amazed we have anything left to grow.
Curious as to what you had in mind (assuming it was broader than Eskimos and snow!)?
I think the usual expression here is don't shit where you eat.
In other words it might serve you well to forge social relationships separately from working relationships.
It's tended to work for me, I'm married, work from home and I haven't had any unfortunate episodes at a work Christmas party. But whatever works for you, I don't think we have to, or even should, all go the same way on this.
I've reached the point of assuming the odds are stacked so heavily that, from a purely financial perspective, it's not worth the investment just to report an issue let alone find it.
A CS lecturer of mine told us that when he was a student he had a lecturer who advised him to be sceptical of AI revolutions. That was nearly 20 years ago. I've no doubt we'll see further steps but I'm not going to hold my breath for something transformative.
I'd probably have bought two if they were out when I was looking last year. Wish them plenty of success, because there aren't many competitors out there with Linux as a first class OS.
Is that a common abbreviation for Saudi? We used to use KSA when I lived there, but I don't trust South Africans not to be violent either. ;)
I keep finding myself working on internal projects that are driven by a UI and have little business logic but lots of I/O to other systems. With no hard requirements, no guarantee of shipping and no direct access to end users. Which I find less suited to unit tests than (automated) integration testing. As soon as you put unit testing in all anyone can ask is what your test coverage percentage is and why it's some value less than 100.
Unit testing is a dev tool, if a dev sees value in writing and maintaining a given test, great, otherwise it could just be that it's not a panacea. Let them strike a balance but ensure the team ask the question of any production issues - could a unit test have prevented this?
Mostly helped by the people I'd normally struggle to contact because they hide away in different buildings, behind different physical and digital security rules, now being much more available for video calls. Appreciate your mileage may vary but it does square with my lived experience.
I've lost some connections with people I only spoke to because we were physically situated together, but that's way outnumbered for me by those I now find more accessible.
Doesn't it just.
I approached someone in charge of innovation for a part of the UK's National Health Service. I offered some software (at no cost to them until they were content it met a need) based on a project I'd worked on in a different part of the public sector where the same idea had been successful. I was turned away, not because it wasn't actually innovative, but because to the NHS innovation meant funding deployment of commercially successful, mature software with existing customers and I didn't own the software from the previous project so I'd written a new (and improved) version.
It still puzzles me. I occasionally wonder how much time he must spend turning away people who have innovation ideas wondering why companies with mature products aren't calling his innovation department.
But it does sometimes mean that there's always just one more AWS service you need. One more service with a different web console UI, varied support in the different infrastructure tools... and now we have another one of those.
All I seem to do these days is AWS infrastructure, sometimes as code. I'm not sure one more new tool is going to improve that.
Words only have the meaning we convey to them and as soon as you put more words in the mix that dilutes any clarity. We're back to the xkcd on standards.
Just today I've caught myself talking about black boxes, no skin off my nose and Chinese whispers, wondering if those are on a list somewhere or if they will be.
I'd say it all feels like papering over the cracks, but the paper isn't even covering the cracks.
I certainly agree there's an issue here.
But I would worry about the creep of this as a feature. Some could argue the mistake was only the timing, or that the mistake was that it was posted where the mob could read it. It seems a natural continuation to move to more specific language. This post was unacceptable. This post was insufficiently researched. This post was bullying. This post was racist.
An analogy is probably a bad idea, but in the same way F1 drivers who don't speak out in favour of BLM as a political movement, rather than just a sentiment, are being criticised I wonder if people who don't use this feature would be further targeted. Whether mobs would feel further validated by it.
We could certainly do with something. I fear the answer isn't technical.
I think it's helping.
If we rename the branches beyond Github's UI lots of things will break. And will it really affect racist attitudes even marginally? I can't see it myself. In which case, rather than progress, it's a distraction from anything that otherwise could afford real progress.
This is about Github.
I'm assuming github are just going to alias it in the UI. I'd hate to have used both a master and a main branch before this.
These guys are obviously immensely impressive, but they're only one part of the chain. It frustrates me to this day that the UK market doesn't allow you to pick the DVB+IPTV STB you want and just expect it to work with any and all services.
I mostly work on relatively short term projects these days rather than long lived products and so my commit messages tend to be single sentences, with an extra paragraph if it was particularly involved. It takes little time and once in a while will be useful.
I probably lean more towards them not mattering that much relative to what anyone who talks about "best practice" would like to see. That said, I picked up a codebase from another team the other day where one commit message was simply a ";)" and the rest not much more in depth. That did make me wince a bit.