curiousObject

A dog will keep biting long after that is a disastrous plan.

Edit: that’s not to deny that big data leaks are a serious problem

The company filed for bankruptcy protection within a couple years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sirius_Systems_Technology

At a higher level of intelligence than many humans, current experience suggests

Yeah $25m is only little but could still be useful

But the source could be the most likely place for corrupt reporting. Or: Maybe the source element is not dangerous but downstream by-products are.

Like you’ve said: It’s a problem.

I think it might still refuse, but in your original test, German usually means a nationality, but African doesn’t.

I’m sure the jokes were terrible anyways

This is a complex problem. But the first step of that problem is Twitter/X

Avoid it, and the next step toward a solution may be easier.

Because of the security and privacy focus of the app, it is best to look there for news about Signal.

https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=signal.org

To pretend to be a person that you are not, on demand, for months on end, is hard and it demands great empathy and skill.

Yet another big problem is that cargo might be too low in value, or even undesirable. Like the cargo of Ammonium Nitrate that exploded in Beirut a few years ago (it had been taken off the docked ship which then sank in the port. The cargo was stored in the port, then stuck in legal and payment disputes, and the result was horrific).

Real cities were all built in the past, for older vehicles, which moved at different speeds, and were controlled by drivers with different goals from today’s drivers.

So, if your game has bad and unsafe road designs, which have been partly retrofitted to reduce the worst problems, then that is accurate.

A game with optimal roads is not an accurate simulation of reality.

A professional modern road designer will simulate the expected movement of vehicles through a new or redesigned road, to try to discover major problems.

They look for problems with turning radius, visibility, stopping distances, and interactions with other road users.

I believe that a game designer could offer to do the same.

The game could draw a good algorithmic road shape first. But next offer the player an option to run a simulation of individual traffic movements, to discover serious issues, and let the player know about problems.

To the OP, I suggest this simulation approach, not trying to discover flawless algorithms. That’s not how it happens in the real world.

Several comments have suggested similar issues.

Also the issues other comments described, including that any fault in the barrier means a new safety hazard

If there’s nothing happening, then the obvious way for the authorities to prove that is to let observers in, and let independent information out. They do not do this, so I will take these reports of deaths more seriously.

One of the emails is yours

You mean these emails are more than just a first verification step to check that your email address exists and to confirm that you want to sign up as a new user?

Luckily, It sounds like this new failure is recoverable by normal user action.

But why not try? It is history, and you are a unique witness of it

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_graffiti

Why?

Though, they do say “these patterns aren’t usually deliberate”.

But even being aware may not mean you really deeply understand why you have a problem.

One reason that it is funny is that it plays against that.

We the audience maybe forget for a moment that we are not watching real life. We are watching a drama or entertainment. So we expect something relevant to happen. That’s the convention.

The exchange plays with that expectation. It deliberately forces us out of our pleasant illusion and makes think us about our real experience - we are sitting in a seat and watching a performance, which is happening at that moment.

And nothing happens, just the same as real life

This story has used other titles, like - What We Lose by Letting AI Speak for Us