This is legally dangerous for the company because those words have generally well understood meanings, so a lawyer could argue that they promise a certain level of service. It’s safer to use vague words to describe the product variants.
1,021 karma · joined February 23, 2023
With the increase of soldered RAM it must be more important than it used to be ten years ago.
Just search for “bcdedit and ‘bad memory’” for more documentation
The OP is not disputing that a lot of writing already had less than zero value to the reader, even decades ago. So that is not their conclusion.
They are really only saying that problem suddenly got MUCH worse.
You said it perfectly - “All writing now is noise”
They want to be certain they have the resources to properly personally verify the operations and trustworthiness of every authorized distributor that they’re vouching for.
Even weight difference might not be obvious. He compared weights for one Ledger product but the small variations in weight among genuine devices made comparisons not clear.
Possibly only X-ray would uncover the fake without cracking the case?
https://youtube.com/@MagicalTux
(Warning - MagicalTux is Tibanne or Mark Karpeles. He has a “complicated” legal history, but this looks legit)
(The MITM supply chain attack which has happened succeeds because it preserves the original secure hardware but intercepts the secret data at the display interface. But a low-effort mimic of the entire device like I suggested? That wouldn’t work).
What you’re describing is a different thing. It’s an “evil maid” attack, when you tamper with a wallet that is already set up by the user. Also, it would be ultra difficult and expensive.
What you’re saying is possible. But:
It would probably be cheaper to build a total fake Ledger Wallet, then just replace the new real wallet and deliver a fake with a weak entropy generator. Any case, that’s not what has happened this time.
That traditionally would be described as “a maze of twisty little passages, all alike”
Me too. I think I’m not communicating clearly. Sorry.
What I’m talking about is a system that does only one third of the steps in the total end-to-end process for ALL your groceries. You do the rest yourself, or use other help.
I’m not advocating a broken system that claims to do that complete process, but really ignores two thirds of your groceries. That would be damn stupid.
Do you understand what I mean?
>A half-working grocery tracking system is useless, much like a car without an engine.
Yes. Something designed to be a half solution can be useful. But a full solution which is broken is probably worse than useless.
A car is a half solution to going to work. A stove is a half solution to preparing food.
Half solutions are what people need. They’re the solutions we are using every day.
There is this huge problem with advertising that makes consumers think a half solution is a 100% solution. Most smart product makers do that trick. But, apart from that problem, ‘the perfect is the enemy of the good’
Edit: but no way would I buy any smart or connected fridge from Samsung. I don’t anticipate that being a positive experience
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-people-often-pick-17-as-a-rando...
I don’t have any specific knowledge about more generalized dev environments such as rust for this scenario. If you go that route I think it would be important to be hyper competent in rust or whatever you use because the game-oriented support is less specific than dedicated game-dev rigs like Godot.
You are developing a project. So you could rethink and repost this later with more focus on your actual project not a hypothetical
Low Low Prices! (Some Hallucinations)
More seriously. How do we fight this? Stricter penalties for these attorneys?
Edit - this case is particularly egregious because it’s not only false citations like you usually get, but even false testimony and false statements from witnesses
You should explain what you want to do
You should say where’s the position of the LLM in the stack. Top, bottom, whatever
I guess the answer to your question is most likely to be No. Perhaps you can be the first one to do it?
https://www.apdaparkinson.org/article/the-relationship-betwe...
That is what OP was trying to say I assume
What research or statistics can you suggest to bolster this argument?
This proclamation, coming from a governmental organization, makes me afraid they are doomed. Effectively they are saying they are fixing the mistake by repeating it.
What they should do is admit fault. Freeze the system. Get independent expert help.
Best wishes, recent Romanian land buyers and sellers
Edit: thank you @cbg0 for giving us this update
But, in its current state of development, is it of any use in earthquake preparedness or immediate response to an earthquake?
The UI is almost perfect, it’s seamless on mobile and desktop.
I made some criticism in other comments therefore I also wanted to make a comment saying what I liked.
Also a version in which your unused time is accumulated for future rounds would be interesting
But if this game was called “Do A Word Puzzle While Being Distracted By Animated Numbers in Your Peripheral Vision”, that would be alright.
But Sandy Peterson is probably right, saying that it ‘Ruined’ the company - as an artistic creative force anyway.
The breakup of the brilliant and well-balanced ID Software team was caused by the trauma of developing Quake.
Romero and others were forced out or quit. This cut the heart out of the team, despite all of Carmack’s drive and technical brilliance
That is why the next leap ahead in games was not Quake 2 (1997), but Half Life (1998) which was, tellingly, based on the older tech Quake 1 engine
https://xcancel.com/SandyofCthulhu/status/206959220964578529...
Interesting to hear about the conflicts and real personal suffering. In spite of that, they built a classic genre-defining game together