1,022 karma · joined February 23, 2023
That should be a solution. But not usually that simple, sadly
The developer/investor wants to produce a product that LOOKS good so that it will sell at a high price. Read the other comments about quality
And, those investors often sell the property before it is finished or before it’s even started. So you have the same problem, with a longer chain of middlemen
I hope it wouldn’t be a huge breakthrough for the virus
Intel did originally call their iAPX CPU the 8800, but that’s almost got to be an unrelated coincidence because the Altair 8800 was launched in late 1974, but the iAPX’s development didn’t begin at Intel until 1975. The iAPX is also an utterly diverse architecture and instruction set that Intel abandoned later, and they continued with the x86 line.
Then they wrote the BASIC interpreter on the emulator, copied it to punched paper tape and Allen wrote the loader for that while he was on the plane to demo it for Altair.
On the real Altair 8800 hardware which they had never seen, it worked first time (they must have had some advance knowledge of the Altair’s I/O functions)
It was a series of amazing feats
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altair_BASIC
Edit: maybe this feat was not so famous because the Altair was not sold in numbers like the Apple II, which Steve Wozniak is well known for (25000 Altairs sold vs Apple’s 6 million - plus clones)
A rare case of meetings proving beneficial? But why?
Technically, none. But Grammarly already has a large market of technically-illiterate users who think it’s easier to keep using the service they already know.
Grammarly got that audience by intensive marketing for years
In this case, the discovery, if it’s real, could get the awards for Physics and also for Chemistry. Because it’s such a once in a century level of scientific breakthrough
Perhaps Physics award mainly for a theoretical explanation and Chemistry award mainly for the experimental process
Therefore, six authors might be honored. It’s unlikely, but it’s a solution if the authors deserve it
I agree. It probably doesn’t make much difference now. There are very unlikely to be any important data that will be lost. The mitigation process they already implemented seems prudent and sufficient
During earlier parts of the mission, like planetary encounters, it would make a difference. Even a two week wait could be much too long in those circumstances.
That’s true, but a failsafe automatic reorientation mode after two weeks with no communication from Earth might be a useful feature
Abandon the work if nobody can replicate LK-99 within a few weeks and you haven’t really lost out badly.
Yes, probably
This blog talks about some of the many pitfalls that could mislead researchers: https://coldfusionblog.net/2019/03/13/the-case-against-cold-...
Some of the errors are very subtle. It’s not surprising that mistakes were made
It’s notable that the first publications about attempts to reproduce the Cold Fusion experiment all reported positive results.
It’s probably because experimenters who got negative results decided they might have done something wrong so they kept trying, and delayed, and they did not publish until later.
Those early reports of positive results were largely retracted within a few weeks.
“https://play.google.com/store/apps/details/id=com.wamble” has a few screenshots from 2022This fact seems a tad more important than the fact that two have died, because that level of intensive medical care doesn’t scale to thousands of victims
But even with all that considered this sounds like a statistical glitch, not an event of significance
>"Reddit needs to be fairly paid to continue supporting high-usage third-party apps. Our pricing is based on usage levels that we measure to be comparable to our own costs," Rathschmidt said in a statement to Bloomberg.
I’m the submitter of this. Source was Bloomberg but I didn’t link direct to Bloomberg because it is soft-paywall : https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-06/reddit-on...
Or that they’d get an enormous marketing campaign, paid for by Nintendo? (This plan appears to be succeeding)
There are some visual clues. First, the chip pins are labeled in the spec so you can guess they’ll be close to relevant units, and also try to trace their connections throughout the die.
Second, units like memory have an obvious regular structure because they are made from many identical micro-units
Third, if you see, for example, 16 identical adjacent units you could guess this is something that could be dealing with data 16 bits at a time. That narrows it down
There are numerous clues like those.
You could also use tricks like using a thermal camera. What part gets hot when you do certain operations?
nɘqO oT ʜƨυԳ
Or
Push To Open
?
Would it be correct to say that, on average, that statement is false for more than half of each Earth year?
Is that file card a thing that the customers carry with them?
Because: Other businesses could begin accepting those same file cards, and the idea will become even more popular and successful and then… oh…
Deleting the whole account so that it cannot be reactivated by the owner is worse.
Making the old account available again for anyone to register is disastrous.
Which is it that they’re planning to do?
User-assignable buttons might mitigate that. With profiles for individual drivers.
But perhaps those features would confuse some users even more
I believe the parrots enjoy this experience but do the parrots understand that they are placing a video call?