4,040 karma · joined July 13, 2010
> Third, the study enabled an unprecedented objective test of survivors’ recall accuracy. Many have wondered: Have those who recall death experiences—even of happenings during the resuscitation—experienced hallucinations, such as commonly reported with oxygen deprivation or psychedelic drugs? Or are their out-of-body reports of cardiac arrest events factual and verifiable?
How does the ability to recall and report an apple, pear or banana confirm/deny whether the persons have experienced a hallucinogenic event or not?
Just send the .eml files as attachments to yourself in a gmail or gapps account. When you click the attachment preview on the received message, it pops out a window displaying the email rendered as if it was sent/received in gmail. Includes inline MIME images too. You can print rendered pages from there.
I found this feature pretty neat! And a bit unexpected.
"This is Your President Speaking: Spoofing Alerts in 4G LTE Networks"
The point of the website is to collect information about drugs for education and research purposes. It's a 501c3 nonprofit, which operates explicitly for public education. It's funded by donors, not by consumers of the info collected.
Anyone who has benefited from Erowid's psychoactive drug info should consider donating!
There is a global outage, stopping hundreds of millions of dollars of credit card transactions from processing, and all the detail they share is:
- "We are continuing to work on a fix for a disruption"
- "At this time, we do not have a solution for the disruption, though we have all the right people working to get it resolved"
- "Very sorry for the inconvenience today."
- "Thank you for your patience!"
The PR team is having to dig really far to avoid writing any duplicate status updates at this point.
With Onion Services however, there is no exit relay. Services are encrypted end to end between the client and the hidden service.
It is a philosophy and adventure book, not about Zen, but filled with many of the author's own unique ideas. He studied Eastern religions and they do inform some of his ideas, which he combines with Western thought in an interesting way. It's off-beat, but I personally found it to be pretty inspiring and would definitely recommend reading it for anyone interested in philosophy.
I would recommend people sit their first retreat at a more supportive and forgiving retreat center. The 10-day Goenka retreats seem to vary in quality and sometimes unnecessarily harsh from what I've read, I've not sat one personally. I don't like the idea of getting all instructions from video also, instead of all the great living teachers out there today.
I'd recommend IMS on the East Coast, and Spirit Rock on the West Coast. They have really great teachers and very supportive schedule and environment for beginners. Downside is it's more costly than a free retreat, but I found it to be very much worth it.
> Man, what a weird week. Unless it's on their own terms, it seems nobody wants to work anymore.
It's the only one with any acknowledgement that agreeable terms may actually be needed in order to attract people to work. It doesn't take a PhD to figure this out!
Utah Phillips, one of my favorite storytellers and all-around anarchist and hobo has a line I was reminded of:
That’s when [Fry Pan Jack] told me – you know, he’d been tramping since 1927 -he said, “I told myself in ’27, if I cannot dictate the conditions of my labor, I will henceforth cease to work.” Hah! You don’t have to go to college to figure these things out, no sir! He said, “I learned when I was young that the only true life I had was the life of my brain. But if it’s true the only real life I have is the life of my brain, what sense does it make to hand that brain to somebody for eight hours a day for their particular use on the presumption that at the end of the day they will give it back in an unmutilated condition?” Fat chance!
From the track Bum on the Rod off the album The Past Didn't Go Anywhere with Ani DiFranco https://youtu.be/-rw4sd4AuJE
Uh, nobody thinks this. I'm sensing an straw man argument fast incoming..
> So it seems unreasonable to stretch the truth to diversify or narrow down the number of people you mention
It's entirely unclear where you see the truth being stretched? Factually recognizing important contributions by people from under-represented backgrounds is doing the exact opposite of narrowing the "number of people you mention". It's literally mentioning more people who contributed to a certain effort or field of study.