128 karma · joined September 5, 2012
2. the other projects it the framework. Aside from the product itself, I've ended up with a really nice framework (FE and BE) and playbook for copilot to follow. I've hit multiple problems with AI generated code and had to rework it like I have for junior devs! But now, the framework focuses the work and stops the slop!
I want to build out all the product-dev-helper tools I've wanted in the past. I've already got a lovely schema-UI system, UI components which are data-aware and the basis of some low-ish-code tools. I've also nearly got a "run tests and fix" local LLM which saves tokens.
Really enjoying this.
Location: UK
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: full stack, especially data-rich / data-heavy applications. E.g. large scale or high complexity of data. Backends include python, node (also java, PHP and others); frontend mostly React but enough experience to adapt. Very deep knowledge of infra and experience in infra-as-code, scaling etc.
Most of my roles are fCTO/fCPO at inflection points: idea to MVP; MVP to stability; stability to scale-up.
CV: See https://danfrost.co.uk/
email: dan@danfrost.co.uk
Also, I've seen the same stacks succeed and fail. The only common thing I can see is:
- when the tech team fully understand the stack they're using - when the tech team fully understand the product and business they're building (and can make appropriate trade offs)
There are a bunch of basic tech things. E.g. the underlying infrastructure has to be performance, scale, secure etc. There's also the issue of choosing a tech you can actually recruit for.
Think "trails" from V Bush's "As we may think" article, implemented so we can collaborate. As users start bookmarking things in their own trail, the app works out what other trails are similar and suggests you merge your researching efforts.