HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

danielrothmann

78 karma · joined October 8, 2025

submissionscomments
danielrothmann··on [dead]
An older post of mine about "company-as-code" was shared here recently. So I thought it might be nice with follow-up about how I'm approaching this practically in my small business.
danielrothmann··on Company as Code
Thanks for sharing!

I wrote this post some time ago, and more recently built a thing to do roughly this for my small business: https://github.com/42futures/firm

Had it in practice for about 4 months now and happy so far. It works for me, at my small scale. Hoping to share a follow-up with lessons learned soon.

danielrothmann··on Show HN: Firm, a text-based work management system
Agreed, this is on my mind as well.

Thinking of Terraform, you have data blocks that can grab data from an external source. Still trying to grok what would be a convenient way of doing something like this - whether that gets generated to DSL, or if data pulled in dynamically as you build the org graph...

Having your plain-text workspace as a unified structural source where you pull in data from external systems would be potentially powerful.

danielrothmann··on Show HN: Firm, a text-based work management system
Healthy skepticism. I think firm differs from ops as code in the sense that it focuses on the structural aspects and representing the people-ops side in a way that machines can interact with too.

To be clear, I'm trialing this out in my own small business. Whether it's ergonomic enough to add value and whether it's scalable, I don't know yet. So far, so good, though.

danielrothmann··on Show HN: Firm, a text-based work management system
It's an interesting trend. With the push for chatbot-based interactions, CLIs and plain text representations are making a bit of a comeback, since LLMs interface with those more easily than UIs.
danielrothmann··on Show HN: Firm, a text-based work management system
I think that's fair. I'm personally happy with a text editor + CLI, but can acknowledge that is not enough for broader adoption.

The project is structured as libraries such that you could build an editor separately, but it's not something that has taken priority for me (as the only user, so far).

danielrothmann··on I am a programmer, not a rubber-stamp that approves Copilot generated code
You've got a point on RTO. Because it's a group behaviour, if you believe it will have positive effects, mandating it could be a way of jumpstarting the group dynamic.

With LLMs, I'm not so sure. Seems more like an individual activity to me. Are some people resistant to new tools, sure. But a good tool does tend to diffuse naturally. I think LLMs are diffusing naturally too, but maybe not as fast as the AI-boosters would like.

The mistake these managers are making is assuming it's a good tool for work that they're not qualified to assess.