They could have fixed this if they cared.
200 karma · joined February 23, 2020
They could have fixed this if they cared.
It is pathetic
Beside don't read too much in to benchmarks. They are alrrady ruined by Goldhart principle. Tgese models have already seen most of the data.
The other day there was a blog post about learning SIMD. I think in future "programmers" will just nag about the speed of the program and the coding assistant will eventually introduce SIMD to the source code.
It is a little sad but we have to go with the current if we want to survive.
Some day China can pioneer in science or technology but the current claim about Chinese companies leading AI development is ridiculous given the evidence of distillation and the fact that like 95 percent of science that lead to the current state of AI happened in either North America or Europe.
To be honest if you want to list academic papers that lead to the current AI models the majority is either done by Google Research or sponsored by Google.
I think the only way to prove that these models are truly as good as they claim is to wait and see if they are getting adopted in practice.
I can name thousands that came out western universities.
I see a lot of rhetoric that only the Chinese labs are contributing to AI while companies like Google and Microsoft are still pulishing their research.
Unfortunately the domain of scientific papers is cluttered with AI slop but still occasional serious paper that i find are from western labs particularly Google Research or Microsoft Research
They will survive and become stronger particularly if they get an economic lifeline out of this peace deal.
Why US has military presence in every other country? Be more MAGA