53 karma · joined September 10, 2017
Some investing incentives are aligned with accurate price discovery, some are not (warren buffet vs a pump and dump).
For example, the top three incidents involve verifiable journalists. You neglect to mention these before skipping to #4, the ACAB twitter account.
1. Set up a pseudo-adversary NN trained to recognize context-correct speech based on a small corpus.
2. Craft a GPT-3 prompt to get N 9s of accuracy
3.Retry if the answer fails the test from the other NN
4. Set a cap on retries based on how many 9s your prompt got
5. If cap exceeded, return a context-free or limited context response
1. Set up a pseudo-adversary NN trained to recognize context-correct speech based on a small corpus. 2. Craft a GPT-3 prompt to get N 9s of accuracy 3.Retry if the answer fails the test from the other NN 4. Set a cap on retries based on how many 9s your prompt got 5. If cap exceeded, return a context-free or limited context response
Basic NATO 5.56 - ie, cheap enough for practice or poorly equipped grunts - is probably ~$0.30/round. However, it doesn't specify the caliber or load.
Loads designed for combat and not practice - like armor piercing, barrier penetration, soft target performance, precision, short barrel optimized, etc. - could be ~2-7x more expensive, and more indicative of a serious organizational problem.
Small arms calibers could include .50BMG, which is also a much larger cost & problem.
Bullets behave very differently according to their mass and velocity, not just their energy. A wound channel for this a particle would likely be very different from any bullet.
Who's the new Google? Is there a company that can pick up the mantle of near-universal desirability to software engineers? I don't think it's any of the other FAANGs.
I'm not familiar with BGP routing attacks; the article above seems to imply the attacker needs to compromise certs in order to glean useful data from the attack.
If that's accurate, is this Google-oriented traffic vulnerable to this type of attack?
Based on this, it seems like multiple barrels probably wouldn't affect each other in different ways, leading to shot consistency as long as there aren't significant differences in ignition time or velocity.
The rifle design objectives are pretty poor, but there's some interesting innovations in there nonetheless. Unfortunately, it's mostly academic; modern symmetric warfare places less emphasis on small arms than ever before, and asymmetric warfare suffers huge diminishing returns from small arms investment.
In short, the AR15/M16 family will be around for a while, and that's fine.
I started a firearms business, and being unable to use Facebook had a huge effect on how I was able to grow my business - making the same decision for political reasons is simply not an option for many small businesses who are just barely getting by.