I suggest you read more about IPFS (or even just other comments on this post), as many of the issues you raise have already been solved (1-3), or have planned solutions (4-5).
319 karma · joined September 28, 2011
2) Yeah, I'll admit the asymmetric nature of home internet is a bit of a hassle. I suspect you'll still require machines on the backbone seeding content, with domestic machines focussed more on providing content to local peers and/or seeding rarely accessed content. In the long-term, IPFS can help ISPs in reducing their costs (content can be grabbed from within their own network, instead of having to peer with another network for almost everything), which might help to convince them to change.
3) IPFS doesn't force you to host any content you don't want to. If you choose to host illegal content, that's your problem.
In terms of revoking access rights, that's not really a problem unique to IPFS (cf. DRM)
Awesome, I brought this up last week:
https://mailbox.org/en also provides a (very reasonably priced) hosted version of OX
> I never write anything down when I'm calculating, because I've always been able to do the sums in my head and it's much easier for me to visualise the answer using my synaesthetic shapes than to try to follow the `carry the one' techniques taught in textbooks we are given at school. When multiplying, I see the two numbers as distinct shapes. This image changes and a third shape emerges --- the correct answer. The process takes a matter of seconds and happens spontaneously. It's like doing maths without having to think.
> [...] I'm multiplying 53 by 131. I see both numbers as a unique shape and locate each spatially opposite the other. The space created between the two shapes creates a third, which I perceive as a new number: 6943, the solution to the sum. [sic]