davidguetta

Im gonna have to disappoint you ><

Don't bet against Google

Controlling the borders and who gets in.

"Being opposed to ethnic erasure" and saying "multiculturalism doesn't work" is not "white supremacy". i didn't now reddit thinking had spilled here

wars exist. if you are a politician it's literally your job to take that into account

the probably that musk acted "on his own intitative" and not with orders / "suggestion" from the us gov is not 100%

there's a level of "naiveté" that's borderline criminal to have been moving on with the previous plan without considering a war could be possible

the level of political correctness he uses to write his email should be forbidden in any tech / medical company lol

ok, that said there has alaways been a bunch of "maybe theorems" it's was a thing even in paul erdos books i think. now we have "maybe proofs". still better than "no proofs"

exactly, cf andrew wiles first proof of fermat's last theorem

oh come on. even andrew wiles made a mistake and his original proof was still instrumental for the final proof of fermat's last theorem

it's called codex / claude code as far as i'm concerned

dna engineering for enhanced carbon capture trees seems in reach. othere less fun stuff could be as well with that technology

idk man it really looks like an opinion i disagree with. had more fun vibecoding 10 projects last month than writing html tables manually 3 years ago on the same projects

Submarine ?

We can blame open ai but we should also argue that government website should be secure...

French people data has been leaker like 4 times and every time its like "eh too bad"

are we talking about weird fantasies / bdsm or just "having a partner" here

they were in 2023

Was it not a former miiltary building wrongly designated by claude as a target ?

> Where no digital cash transaction can be trusted or validated

lol i have bad new for you.

in anycase any attack to the finanical system would be resolved super fast and the ai would be cut off if that happen. this will literally never happen for that reason

Yes and there's even a stronger argument that we could REQUIRE frontier model to be open weight / open source.

At the end of the day they were built from data that did not belong to them. So it would be fair that humanity REQUIRES to give back the output of that.

It's a bit like the free software thing: you can still make money from it and providing service to it, but if you build it based on another free stuff the derivative should be free.

Why not do the same for intelligence ?

Wow great

And do what with it ?

how much of the "codex discussion" was actually ideas also generated by open ai ? this is a bit the elephant in the room

I am not rewriting. I am saying AI is not more dangerous in my opinion that Nuclear Weapons.

I just don't see a bigger danger in AI than nuclear weapons tbh. If you can provide one to me i'll be happy to change my mind but most if what i read is

- cybersecurity => well bro if you can hack system with an ai you'll find way to make them more safe with ai too.

- biological issues => ok this is the ONLY one where an insane dude / regime could generate a super powerful. but i don't undesrtand how you can argue that we should stop AI in the risk some ai generate a super powerful virus. If you don't get there first (to AGI) and let a bad actor do it first (china is not gonna stop) then you will have no chance countering this virus anyway

- the robots taking over is fantasy to me.

but once again i could be wrong

I don't know man, i think racing to AGI to it is still the best thing to do.

People claiming dangers and risk are just pretending or posturing. There's no more tangible risk than nuclear weapons, which we handled, and the upsides are insane.

it's funny how insane reasoning like yours has been normalized to justify equally insane policies of letting unchecked thirld worlder in

As a right wing / afd ally said in France litterally said yesterday:

Do you know where extreme-right is low ? in Danemark. You know why ?

because the SOCIALIST PARTY implemented the end / started being tough ob illegal immigration.

it never was about anything else than the majority of people tired of being force-fed immigration by european elites

solve this issue, solve "extreme right"

and it was the same in the US

at that point people not seeing this are mentally ill in my opinion

Like "stop consuming" was a realistic idea lol.