784 karma · joined August 10, 2021
The charitable interpretation is that she wanted to write “The Book” on Stuxnet. But it seems like a weird thing for a journalist to attempt. It’s like if Carreyrou spent 100 pages describing micro-fluid physics in Bad Blood.
In a way it’s similar to a gateway in that you are composing different backend targets. Although it might just be a marketing neologism describing middleware.
I didn’t know there was a movie, but I found the book mostly boring too. She dived deep(ish) technically in three areas: malware, nuclear centrifuges, and policy.
Who exactly is that for? I enjoyed the long description of the program itself but I doubt most non-tech people would. The scientific background on centrifuges was painfully dry to me. By far the best part of the book was the human interest stories about the security researchers who found and reverse-engineered Stuxnet.
I probably liked it because at the end the protagonist’s company starts making progress on clearing their ops backlog which was cathartic for me to fantasize about.
As for actual best, Tenebaum’s Distributed Systems was a key read for me starting my career as a first year developer working on large backend systems. I’ve probably forgotten 95% of the content, but it helped me develop intuition for the reasons and tradeoffs of system decision decisions.
It’s 96 pages over your limit, but a lot of the end chapters of the book’s parts can be skipped. Also Designing Data-Intensive applications covers some of the same content with slightly less rigor so that is a good substitute.
GET website/path HTTP/1.1 Host: website2
Some servers, like NGINX, will key on the request line domain (website) to find the logical server block rather than the host header (website2).
This can lead to interesting outcomes
But teams also benefit from having at least a few people innately interested in tech (too much “passion” is probably bad too). If lots of people consciously take the mercenary position, it can damage the whole team’s morale because unsurprisingly the necessary but unglamorous work gets de-emphasized more than usual. This eventually drags down everyone’s performance and increases the likelihood of stressful events like outages.
It’s a cool theory though, and the circumstantial evidence is there. Which is why I shared
There was a recent post sharing an article trying to add nuance to popular understandings of the Viking age. The response was pretty negative. It’s sad so many people only see history as a cultural centripetal force to reinforce in-group ties.
I think the argument in favor of a more contemporaneous date would that the Hebrews would have to remember the Greek connection hundreds of years later, long after the Philistines became Canaanized. Also I think I remember Judges and Samuel (referenced in article) are among the oldest books in the Bible (don’t know Jewish name for these set of books).
https://jbqnew.jewishbible.org/jbq-past-issues/2016/443-july...
I will have to buy Why Homer matters.
But yes, many countries hype up the historical peoples that lived within their modern-day borders or who spoke a similar language. Now, it definitely seems like countries in the Balkans, Near East, and Caucus region are keen to jump on any genetic or archaeological result that supports their nation building project.
I do think passion in a more abstract sense is a strong signal thorough. Such as passion for learning new things, solving complex problems, investment in collective outcomes, etc