759 karma · joined July 5, 2013
Probably not, but I heard from an acquaintance college admissions official that systems like this exist, and they are highly secretive. This is just one anecdote, so make of that what you will.
The same may be true of LLMs and all the hallucinated information they share. I would respect and listen to what experts in psychology have to say here by default.
I disagree with any top-down pressures to "solve" this tension.
That said, do not dismiss the need for long-term, in-person friendship. IRL forces you to confront the uncomfortable/mismatched parts of others. In other words, the whole person. It enables you to comfort and support in a way that is impossible online. This is all both uncomfortable and necessary to form the most meaningful and worthwhile relationships, not to mention vital social skills.
The Internet is an incredible tool to connect like-minded people, but it will not bring happiness in the same way the flesh and blood presence of consistently physically present people can.
Citation needed. Log4j comes to mind as a logic bug disaster, but all the data I've seen is that >65% of the high severity bugs come from memory unsafety in most software projects.
https://security.googleblog.com/2022/12/memory-safe-language... https://alexgaynor.net/2020/may/27/science-on-memory-unsafet...
This is a false dichotomy. Bugs are concentrated in new code, so the biggest value for Rust is to use it going forward, interoperating with existing C and C++ code. Going backwards and rewriting low bug density code should not be a priority. Both of your alternatives only address existing code.