5,091 karma · joined January 21, 2014
So it's not surprising someone would be against restricting gambling. The hard part is to how the gov should do it. But it's not government's job to please every single person.
I know what my next car will be.
I propose to compare aerospace with aerospace.
I drove a little Toyota Tahoe with the same tiny battery and the reason is clear -- it replaces first gear. So you can have much simpler and reliable transmission, and be more efficient at cities stop signs.
I'm more surprised it passed through the committee, they should've seen that back in 2011. I can not imagine such a bug in spec would pass through a Java committee, as they discuss every little thing for years (sometimes decades). It's not like embedded code is something new.
This measure add similar incentive for data breaches.
IMO the discussion without Go is really lacking, as it's the whole point of Go.
PS: California, not cyanoacrylate.
Of course, for some results there are proofs discovered only under one axiomatic, but it's true under some others as well, just the proof wasn't discovered yet.
You probably heard about Goedel Incompleteness -- the proof that the the axiomatic itself cannot be proven, like using ZFC to prove ZFC, but that's another topic.
It would be fun to play with this Anthropic/Lean formalization under different axiomatics.
Travel cheap countries.
Make (more) kids.
Woodworking is always here. As is local politics. But you said you're not up to building something.
I've read an archeological analysis of a merchant ship rowers-slaves -- every skeleton had perfect teeth. Because slaves were fed only fish, not any bread, bread was a product that merchants traded, while fish was cheap and abundant.
So I think "fish bad" opinion was just because fish was cheap and everyone had it.