190 karma · joined September 8, 2018
I beg to disagree here, swapping CPUs would definitelly prove to be extremelly costly in every possible way. Not only do the MoBo + CPUs themselves have a cost, but they also do not exist. That would mean a huge spike in AMD (or whatever vendor) demand, one that they don't even have the capacity to manufacture. On top of that, all the kernel optimizations over the years, which have a big impact in the overall costs of a cloud service, would be lost. All that ignoring the logistical side of swapping motherboards and CPUs, transport, risk and everything.
> SQL is a very high level of abstraction, to the point where the argument is a bit absurd when compared to a very concrete example of COBOL. Yes, if we had to rewrite everything that utilized SQL then it would take an incalculable amount of effort.
You're right. Let me swap that with OracleSQL or MySQL, that'd make more sense.
> I feel like you're kind of hitting the nail on the head with the Linux kernel bit though -- yes we could replace all uses of the Linux kernel with one of the many alternatives available, but it would take a long time. More likely we'd see a major transition to one of the other available kernels. This is exactly the situation COBOL is in.
Imo the Linux kernel position is not the same as COBOL. COBOL is mainly being maintained, whereas Linux is the current standard for new projects and will remain so for the foreseeable future. If we create a new project running on COBOL, or a new project running on a Linux server, those are two completely different situations.
> All this though -- and I think we're just talking about a semantic difference on the use of "%1 powers the %2". Arguably C, SQL, and Javascript provide the value to users which encourages them to spend their money which encourages further development. So okay, I think I follow where you're coming from. COBOL doesn't power the economy, it's just the most common form of infrastructure for us to extract value from the economy. That sound a bit more correct?
Yes, exactly my point. The economy is not "powered" by banks, it is powered by those who create economic value, and they do not use COBOL all that much.
So saying COBOL powers the global economy is indeed a stretch. Want to say Linux powers it? True, Intel powers it? True. COBOL... not so much. Imagine rewriting every COBOL system in the world, now change that into replacing all Intel cpus, ~~SQL~~ OracleSQL or MySQL databases or Linux kernels...
Edit: saying "SQL Databases" makes as much sense as saying "procedural programming languages", updating it to make more sense
I am sure there's a lot of it running still, mission critical stuff, also that there are still a few teams creating new projects with it. So it is not dead by this definition. But if I'm honest, I can't name one single language that is.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/2522017/microsoft-admi...
PS: writing this at the office, feeling sleepy... they won't allow remote work... and this computer takes a while to build, 23x more than my personal workstation, I timed it.
Before that, to release a game, one would need a publisher, a distribution deal, a ton of money wasted to get the game into the player's hard drives.
What Valve did is much much more significant for the gaming industry and sparked a ton of indie developers. That's much more impactful than half life 3 could have ever been.
Still, in one hand, if you are now having a change of heart, it probably means you are burnt and don't trust your own chance of ever making those '6 figure' look up to you (instead of down on you). On the other hand, you are 30, and for an entrepreneur, 30 is young. No one would expect you to be a millionaire by now.
If you say "but I'm doing this ever since I was 18yo," to that I answer: that was an 18yo trying to do stuff, not an experienced professional. That builds up experience, but given one is starting at such a young age, expecting it to build up results from the get go is optimistic (read really silly here).
So here's what I'd tell you if you were a personal friend: give not being an entrepreneur a try. Find a job, get a reasonable position, and a year from now you will know what you were missing on and what you lost on the transition.
No decision is final when you are 30yo.
Pulling it from steam is reason enough for me.
Still learning how to do "Professor X's questions" was a guaranteed ace. Forget the subject, memorize the borderline cases, max grade. Do all exercises on the text book, also, get a second text book and do all of those too, and you might fail the test.