That would be the end of free gmail.
527 karma · joined March 21, 2009
That would be the end of free gmail.
Indeed, for us, encryption at rest is only meaningful if we cannot access the mails either. However, that is nowhere on the horizon for email. There is a technical way to achieve that, but at a great cost of usability.
Encrypting the disks themselves is trivial and is on our roadmap, but it is nowhere as important as some providers tend to boast. That is why we say "quackery." It is just a "nice-to-have", but in every-day security it matters just as much keeping your car keys in a sealed jar all the time, carrying the jar in your pocket =)
Our data is stripped among multiple disks in RAID10 (obviously), that by itself ensures very little importance to a single disk. Not to mention that if a disk is dead, one would have to find it, identify it belongs to specific user and recover it. This is more likely:
Processes inside of the data center are way more important than an extra layer of encryption for a hollywood heist.
In our so far experience, the biggest threat to users' data are the users themselves. Forgetting passwords, accidentally deleting mails, running malware, choosing weak passwords...
It is interesting that we have never seen this issue raised for Outlook, Gmail, Zoho, Yahoo, AOL and other large providers, who never did or will encrypt at rest.
With hosted services there has to be a chain of trust. We trust our providers (ISP, data centers etc), and our users trust us as a provider.
Furthermore email is generally being observed wrongly today [IMHO]. Email message is a equivalent of an open envelope, a postcard. The only way to security is end-to-end encryption. This way, the need to trust the provider is removed. We could say openly we do have encryption at rest, but that claim cannot be proven by anyone. Same way as Whatsapp says they are E2EE but being a closed protocol, we still have to trust Whatsapp they are telling the truth.
As a provider you have to choose what is worth implementing and what not, what realistically benefits users and what not. Military grade security is silly for email in our opinion. If that is requirement, one should probably not be using email at all. Use Whatsapp :D
Jokes aside, we just try to keep a sane approach to security and not take absolutist stand, all or nothing. It is always a compromise between usability for the user, maintenability for the sys admin and cost. We are not on the expensive side meaning we have to take sane compromises.
If you are willing to pay a premium for absolute security, we can of course do that for you, but we know no one will be willing to pay, and those that do, we probably do not want to have such users, based on our experience from @protonmail users using Migadu. There is tutanota for that purpose btw.
Email was not meant to do many of the things we today try to use it for. It is much more complex than majority will even know and appreciate unless they become providers themselves.
I would appreciate to hear the technical reasons why we are wrong on security topics, and less of personal sensibilities. This will contribute to the discussion better and potentially to the email ecosystem :)
We will gladly sponsor you with email services - migadu.com regardless of your status. No cloud storage though and no documents/spreadsheets. Groups/forums/email lists are coming soon by the end of the year. Calendar is due in a few weeks.
I agree with you, but in the end, if all of those are correct on our side, it simply can be the spam filter on the other side. It is not only the sender who decides the deliverability :)
We do not use any tracking pixels.
Btw. Any suggestion is more than welcome and highly appreciated! Thank you for looking at Migadu!
Sending sales emails is not the same as spam, at least not in the lines of business using Migadu. We are not judging what people do for living, but rather try to aid them with a worthy advice if there is a better way. Working hand in hand with users pays off and we both enjoy it. We're tired of being nobody to some wise Google(rs)....
If sales stop, the world would stop. Everyone sells something to somebody.
Everyone is quick to jump and blame the small guy. :) Our reputation score is actually better than some of the largest email providers because of our low volume and individual verification.
We do have sales teams using Migadu. However, they simply estimated how much they would send and signed up for the higher plan. It's straight forward I believe.
We do not accept PayPal in the interface, but will accept payments for yearly plans on individual basis. So if you wish to use PayPal, please just get in touch for now.
I'd classify Migadu in a different category. If you run multiple projects or just need extra addresses fast at no extra costs, you'd probably not go for FastMail. I can clearly see using them both.
Nevertheless, thank you guys for all the suggestions, we will work to get 2FA in ASAP.
We used to use Google Apps for multiple domains for our starup projects, ideas etc. Switching between these multiple accounts was becoming ridiculous and complex. Then, they made it $5 per account. We actually had many addresses but only two users. Our total cost of that would be measured in hundreds of $ which def would not be worth it.
What I personally dislike regarding other services is that they claim storage as one of the most important selling points but then do not account for the price drop per GB. Since GMail for work launched (2006?), the cost per GB dropped more than sixty fold: http://www.mkomo.com/cost-per-gigabyte-update
Any update in price? Nope. And then, the price of Google Apps (Gmail) are global. We have clients in Zimbabwe for instance. $5 per month per account is not the same as it would be in the US. Yet if a company from Zimbabwe uses a @gmail address, it won't be taken serious.
Migadu is profitable since a while ago, and real money is relative. We're not after exits and TechCrunch, just doing what we like and hacking at it daily. :) Pays the bills. Ironically, we are also in Switzerland, where living expenses are among the highest in the world.
Thanks for the assertions though! :)
The mail going to junk is an unfortunate reality, there are never any guarantees with any mail service, and especially with new services. We've already had the big ones play muscles on us several times.
Thank you for reporting the new tab bug, will be fixed!
The webmail / ui demo is coming up too. Thank you for suggesting it!