You want people to think you're a specious disingenuous person? It's of your own doing.
658 karma · joined August 12, 2011
They also like to muddy the waters, climates change, because climates aren't even a thing, but an aggregate, obviously. Anthropogenic climate change, is what's being questioned, and that there is no certainty that it will cause disasters any more so than if there was still 300ppm CO2 in the atmosphere. Maybe 400ppm is bad, doesn't seem so tho, we are living the experiment.
BUT also, I would bet Air Conditioners are far worse for the planet than 400ppm CO2, even if they act together. ACs, are, absolutely abysmal thermodynamically. Heating up one space to make another space colder temporarily, with high likelihood of CO2 release.
Slight tangent. Have you heard the sixth Dimmu Borgir album? Good stuff. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFRwNYPsHwY
I wonder will it generate any discussion, or just be castigated via downvotes, your choice.
Thinking about advertiser bytes on my ethernet cables, makes me feel, compromised. I did not consent. It must end.
IMO, finding things, also covers not being aware it existed.
Like you're on amazon searching for something, and they suggest something you might also like, they don't know if you knew about it already. That's fine, still both parties consenting.
People need to have the capacity to find things.
Today we have the internet, and search engines.
If people want something, they can look.
In this way, all parties consent, otherwise advertisements are harassment.
Tbh
They (like us) have been evolving under thermodynamic pressures for millions of years, I would like us to be able to not have to produce them to have high quality protein/fat/etc, but I haven't seen anything to say it's remotely possible.
it "absolutely" is, anything that exists, is fundamentally a question of thermodynamics, it's unavoidable.
https://www.theregister.com/2024/06/20/oracle_java_licence_t...
I'm sure it's optional, or at least hope it is, cause it might not be good in all contexts
we already differentiate accidents to deliberate intent.
intent to commit crime, kinda implies hate, so the prefix of "hate" to the word crime, is, pointless
I agree generally tho, the entire farce is a ploy to allow discrimination and vague laws to suppress l'homme du jour
cause it's an assumption our "measurements" are representative of the reality of what's actually going on that far away.
we can't verify anything from this distance, so calling it empiricism is a stretch
That was but a skirmish, they've been "at war" since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Gaza#Israeli_contro...