3,579 karma · joined October 6, 2016
Oh it definitely wasn’t. The other reasons are valid though.
Another example, you know those UIs that might drop down when you click on a chrome extension icon? No need to use react for a simple extension drop down.
If you’re building a 1st party platform or webapp then react makes more sense. But there’s clearly usecases for React-lite.
Regardless, preact core is boring and stable (like 5 years old). I built a multi-million dollar company on it previously for what it’s worth.
There’s also the problem that AI can’t be specific. I can’t design merch with a specific video game logo or band name. The output always has that “AI dream residue”.
This is a useful tool only for creative inspiration.
Awesome. I was using an LSP server for F# (in Sublime Text) on an M2 Mac and it was always running at 500%+ CPU. I had to turn off the LSP server. Hopefully this version fixes it.
The problem with the (* *) comments is that I can select a block of text, a portion of which is already commented out, and commented the whole selection. You can't solve this without lossy commenting (e.g. removing the inner comment). The portion that is already commented will screw it up. This doesn't matter in single line comments since it will just add an additional "//" in front of a commented line.
I do feel like engineers who put themselves out there and engage on HN, Github, Chat groups, etc, get "polished" and get better as engineers, assuming that association in these forums causes them to read more code or think about paradigms.
If "silent" are mostly keeping to themselves, they might have some of their own innovations independent from mainstream engineering, but lack common knowledge, which can be accounted for by reading a lot of programming books, release notes, docs, etc.
Unrelated, some unsolicited feedback for bloggers, I like to click on images to zoom in (quicker than ctrl+equal 5 times). So at the very least please wrap the images in a link to the image src. a humble request.
I've been using f# for a couple years, and after the honeymoon phase is over, I've started to really value the benefit of native interop with dotnet libraries.
Most enterprise SDKs/libraries (e.g. AWS S3, Stripe, Twilio, Rollbar, etc) have a dotnet SDK, and it just drops into an F# codebase as if it were a 1st party lib (you reference them using object-oriented dot notation instead of functional style, but still it just works).
Even when Microsoft puts work into, for example, cryptography security updates or JSON parsing performance, F# benefits from that.
Or conversely, make the visible text “pointer-events: none” and it sits in front of the dangerous text.
> Let's keep the greed at bay.
Tell that to the university endowments.
maybe. If it becomes normalized, it would alter the cost-benefit dynamic in degrees even more and not place as much pressure on pursuing a more valuable degrees. Hopefully this is a one-and-done and we can be more creative going forward, like providing more grants for deeper, more fundamental degrees like chemistry, math, computer engineering, manufacturing, etc.
> same can be said about financial sector bailouts, agricultural subsides
agree. we need to let companies properly decompose. It unintuitively creates more growth, and new companies are created from the ashes. Injecting old companies with formaldehyde creates sclerotic monoliths.
For example, in the funnel of a customer visiting amazon to finally buying a product, amazon loses millions of dollars when initial page load times are 300ms slower within that funnel.
Any added friction between stages in a funnel will reduce the result at the end of the funnel. You add scheduling complexity, physical driving, distributed workforces, etc, and the number of shared lunches are going to drop super fast. Hell, you put 2 onsite employees in 2 different buildings on campus and their chance at a lunch together will drop.
If you or your company cares about in-person collaboration or socializing, you had better foster that behavior and not count on raw willpower to break out of the mold.
In his example, he tested out of classes that he was already proficient in—not all classes. Doing this occasionally would allow you to have more time for things that matter.
If OP's homeschooled kids were the ones denigrating public school while making spelling/grammatical errors then it'd be ironic.
Whites (non-Hispanic) are only 28.9% and Asians/Indians are 40.6%.
That's already cryptographically built into email with DKIM. An email message is signed with a private key, and can be verified as authentic by the receiver using the public key in the sender's DNS records.
Click on "Show Original" in a Gmail mail to see the meta data.
A larger profitable company has more chance of survival by shrinking into a smaller profitable company. It's a buffer. But an already small profitable company doesn't have that option, there's more risk.
I would say that to attempt to have zero growth/shrinkage is difficult in business. The market is always changing, people's preferences change, etc. If you try to stagnate you will likely find yourself shrinking, either because demand changes, or there are mixups in supply (competitors).
If shrinking is the only non-goal, then growth is likely the only prevention since stagnation is hard to ensure.
is that true for the desktop web client?
"They paved paradise to put up a parking lot"
- https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1553488459855167491?s=20&t...
- https://www.axios.com/2021/10/02/coppertone-sunscreen-recall...
coppertone and banana boat issuing recalls.
The advice of protecting skin is still valid, don't get burned.