3,784 karma · joined August 14, 2017
In general: funding for studies and funding for critical review should overlap as little as possible.
Okay, so they are not sharing data and your whole premise was wrong. That happens. But now how do you change your mind?
These are immediately, negatively obvious as AI content.
For the other questions the consensus of many publications/journals has been to treat grammar/spellcheck just like non-AI but require that other uses have to be declared. So for most of your questions the answer is a firm "yes".
Manufacturers were contractually forbidden from doing that.
As prominent examples look at the news stories about lawyers citing nonexistent cases or publications.
People think that LLMs do information retrieval, but they don't. That is what makes them harmful in education contexts.
There are lots of different types of soy sauce catering to different uses.
Managing multiple email accounts in a single interface.
Easily moving emails between different accounts and from online to offline.
Relatedly, storing years of emails with attachments on a local drive is cheap. Storing them in webmail is a hefty subscription fee. I have no issue with one time payments, but I like to minimize subscriptions.
There are lots of blindingly obvious qualitative statements, where the quantitative parts is far from obvious. That makes them a good starting point for research.
This is like writing about Newton's theory of gravity as "scientist finds out apples fall downwards. Wasn't that already obvious?".
Both notions are useful for different purposes and nix is not particularly good at the first one.
If you need something like
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinta_(software)
use that. If you want something like krita, use that. And if you need something like gimp, paint.net is not even in consideration because it is decidedly something else
If you argued that it was clearly labeled as malware for educational purposes, that seems fine. It was distributed, but then distribution is allowed. But this is very clearly not the case here.
Same idea as for patents vs trade secrets.
Isn't that entirely expected? Someone coming to the US on a work visa gets assigned an SSN, works for some time and then leaves.
https://www.salon.com/2018/02/12/thom-hartmann-how-the-gop-u...
In brief: It worked very badly the first time and the only reason you were conned into thinking differently was massive debt.
https://www.logicalincrements.com/
Still accessible but only for dedicated hobbyists with deeper pockets.
https://ollama.com/library/deepseek-r1
This includes the full model and additionally several distills.
I agree in principle that this is much nicer in theory. Just like wired is more reliable than wireless. However, retrofitting all that is also much more difficult.
Neither. The precision lines are workstations addressed at a very different audience. So for the average customer the "better" ranking is non-pro, then pro and only in exceptional cases pro max. The actual differentiator is the blank, plus, premium afterwards.
Bonus questions: which models have ECC ram and quadro cards available? Which ones have the best displays? My guess would be pro max premium and non-pro premium, but that is far from obvious.
So, neat, I guess, but not convinced I would pay four macbook airs for that.