I think we will keep reading more and more of these Apple stories and it feels like shit is getting worse as time goes by
166 karma · joined February 18, 2014
I think we will keep reading more and more of these Apple stories and it feels like shit is getting worse as time goes by
The idea of nostr is that you can do whatever the you like. An open protocol. There is no forbidding of anything
I found the bundle scripts already prefer VULKAN_SDK/VULKAN_SDK_ROOT, but the build script only scans ~/VulkanSDK
There are a lot of pretty good nostr clients: Primal, Amethyst, X21.social, Yakihonne, Nostrudel, Jumble. And most of them are OSS
* i'd love to hear a sample/customer call. Even if it's just a test
* a blog without rss? How can i subscribe for part 2?
Trying workmux with claude. Really cool combo
We run a platform that handles story publishing, media delivery and newsroom workflows for hundreds of organizations, with millions of readers hitting it every month. PHP on backend (API's/app), TS/React on frontend.
Hiring: • Senior Backend Engineer (PHP, Symfony, PostgreSQL) • Full-Stack Engineer (React, TypeScript, PHP)
Why join Prezly? • Work on systems that deal with high traffic, large media libraries and evolving data models • Improve and modernize a long-lived PHP codebase without breaking production • Own features end-to-end: database → API → UI → production • Direct line to product and customers, no layers of PMs or process • Profitable, remote-first company with high autonomy
Stack: PHP (Symfony), PostgreSQL, React/TypeScript, Kubernetes on AWS. We actively use AI coding tools like Claude Code and Cursor.
Apply: https://careers.prezly.com
Disagree though, people manage keys just fine, or they can be thought.
But even if there are people in the world that never get it, it could be outsourced to a central identity provider that manages your key and messages. For the end user they would have a user/password combo they can reset.
If the network becomes more popular someone will definitely build something like that.
The technical capabilities (remote signers, bunkers, ...) already exist
Everyone can announce to the network where they read/write from. Clients can figure out (based on the people you follow) from which relays to get the content.
I've been using it like this for nearly a year. It works
Your followers fetch the note from your relays. You tell the network where they can find your notes (self hosted relay) and their client will take the effort to find your content
But it's kinda a solved problem (not through PoW) but through Web of Trust and not having algorithms. You see what the people/communities you follow post.
> I tried Nostr but like a lot of people here have been saying, it falls short in many ways due to the way it is structured. Relays are not really relays, they are more but also less. They are like community servers. Sure you can connect to many, have the same UI, but they are still disjoint and feels lonely.
I'd like to know more. Imho the fact that relays are dumb is a feature.
> You keep saying you can sign your messages and there is value there to people who are saying it is censorable in the ways they described.
All messages are signed. There is no way NOT to sign a message. This comes with the advantage that you don't need to trust the relays/pipes where messages go through which is an immense benefit
> This is not a personal thing, I want to like Nostr and I tried using it. I can and would probably get some use out of using it as a pubsub or message delivery infrastructure for two things I want to connect but what if the relay goes down? It is like a centralized pubsub messagebox thing. But can't even do that fully.
Relays go down all the time. There was an experiment where a major relay (Damus) just deleted the entire dataset. People barely noticed. And as any client (not just the author) and other relays can re-broadcast events the relay eventually recovers.
> There needs to be some sort of relay to relay communication (actual relaying) that needs to go on. And that wouldn't scale, even if it would work for now.
There are three mechanisms that do that:
- clients posts to multiple relays - clients/followers can rebroadcast notes (to other relays) - quite a few relays are syncing (negentropy sync)
Original Author posts a kind:1 note with a question
A bot sends a kind:1985 note (NIP-32 https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/32.md) that labels the content.
It can be done by the author (self-label), by an app, or by third parties (moderators/curators), depending on the trust model.
Other clients can decide to use that classification/label
--
For moderation purposes. If the behavior is closer to abuse (spam, scams, harassment...), use NIP-56 (Reporting). Reporting harmful/should-be-moderated content.
Using NIP-65 (https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/65.md) you can broadcast a note to the network to mention your preferred relays.
Most clients fetch that note when you first sign in and make sure you connect to your preferred relays
3rd parties can still come in and try to offer value. But they can not sit between your interactions as clients are interchangeable
Things that come to mind:
- adding 'account required' screens so information is harder to access
- harvesting/selling that ip without your explicit consent (although you agreed in the TCs)
Main idea:
- Portable identity - Your data/posts/reputation is yours - Client choice: Use any nostr client to reply from/to - Open ranking/Anti-Spam: Web-Of-Trust/Global pagerank - Zaps/Payments weigh more than likes (likes are cheap)
So it's to relay operators in combination with WoT (web of trust) on the client (and sometimes relays)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45300004 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45299986
Identity on nostr is just a public/private keypair.
You can enhance that identity by sending a kind0 (metadata) note with your name, bio, pictures. So i guess you're suggestion to add PoW for kind0 events which is covered by NIP13 too.
The answer is trusted relays and Web of Trust
Long-time nostr user. My feeds are all spam free. Not to say there aren't any other problems :-)
But...Nostr (and other decentralised social media protocols) can offer things the existing platforms can not do: interoperability.
Imagine the people you follow to be the same from FB, to strava, to spotify... Imagine the content (signed notes) you make are available on different clients/platforms
That UX, perhaps for use-cases and projects we can't imagine today will be so much better than what we have today. I've tasted a little bit of just that switching between my Nostr twitter-like client (Primal/Yakihonne) and the Podcast app (foundtain.fm). It blew my mind.
This opens use cases the existing platforms can only dream about.
We've been talking a lot about this problem in nostr which can't be summarised in a quick HN comment but gathered some threads if you're really interested
https://asknostr.site/question/note1es989rjaccw82gpp705u462y... https://asknostr.site/question/note12dp9ewpngxejq8w9s6699k5z... https://asknostr.site/question/note1cp5cw366g7q9c2txvtrws0h7... https://asknostr.site/question/note1zqjk556quu6rvyetzvhdv7p3... https://asknostr.site/question/note1ss842g38wafwcfexd78gx0sc...
There is a very insightful thread on nostr about it -> https://asknostr.site/question/note1lhvk3kkmaev6qzlpzzns69vw...
The top voted answer was
> Relays have to become more whitelisted and less open, and clients have to implement outbox model and stop relying on 2 or 3 big relays, then we can just stop worrying about this.
https://asknostr.site/question/note1534t79a5nk8ajcx8xqlsa3pr...
But it's still early and not all clients support it.