1,270 karma · joined December 31, 2013
Just state the information you want to communicate in the plainest and most straightforward way possible.
This seems outrageously high. The study says it is an "estimate". I'm willing to be their methods or assumption are seriously flawed. Would be curious if someone has looked into it.
So this applies to even, say, mid-level developers? Wouldn't you get work assigned to you after you're hired, or do you actually have to hunt for your own projects, like you might in some consulting firms?
Just start smaller. I'm not sure why people try to jump immediately to creating an entire app when they haven't even gotten any net-positive results at all yet. Just start using it for small time saving activities and then you will naturally figure out how to gradually expand the scope of what you can use it for.
There is a section in the article about future real world application, but I feel like these articles about quantum "breakthroughs" are almost always deliberately packed with abstruse language. As a result I have no sense about whether these suggested real world applications are a few years away or 50+ years away. Does anyone?
It would be just like in the Dungeon Crawler Carl books (and probably other scifi/fantasy books)
This could be the problem, especially if you are close to 40 years old. You may be starting to develop presbyopia, which is typical. In the early stages you can still read and focus on closeup things fine, so you may not realize it is starting, but in the background your eyes are, in fact, straining a lot and causing headaches.
Yes, also ironic how they were, per the article, very intrigued by the concept that ideas themselves could be like viruses but were unaware of how they seemed to be heavily impacted by that very thing, many times over.
Agree, good writeup, but also a stretch to say they are "pinpointing" anyone's location.
What if he fell facedown on something like a blanket and couldn’t breathe??
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00247-018-4149-1
> Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the leading cause of fatal head injuries in children younger than 2 years.
> There is no controversy concerning the medical validity of the existence of AHT, with multiple components including subdural hematoma, intracranial and spinal changes, complex retinal hemorrhages, and rib and other fractures that are inconsistent with the provided mechanism of trauma
Are these system prompts being continuously refined and improved via some rigorous engineering process with a huge set of test cases, or is this still more of a trial-and-error / seat-of-your-pants approach to figure out what the best prompt is going to be?
LOL
And in classic fashion, of course the moderators locked it as "off topic".
But if it's possible for the neural net to memorize passages of text then surely it could also memorize where it got those passages of text from. Perhaps not with today's exact models and technology, but if it was a requirement then someone would figure out a way to do it.