I just went with the original background made by the person who seemingly invented the meme format on Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/incorrecttintin/162088281738
634 karma · joined August 16, 2023
https://github.com/dnlzro
I just went with the original background made by the person who seemingly invented the meme format on Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/incorrecttintin/162088281738
It is probably technically possible to have the time continue to update with just CSS on the client (based on [1]), but the initial time still has to be set server-side.
[1] https://css-tricks.com/of-course-we-can-make-a-css-only-cloc...
Out of curiosity, what’s your font of choice?
"Currently, I am working on [...] direct CUDA implementation, which will be significantly faster and probably come close to PyTorch."
[1] https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2022/01/28/if-every...
"Vigorously styled hyperlinks on a page tend to move to the foreground of a reader’s attention, like an HDTV in a hotel bar. [...] The red circle is meant to be noticeable while you’re reading the sentence that contains the link. Otherwise it disappears, so as not to distract."
There’s also fruits like coconuts, which don’t have seeds like we normally think of them. The coconut we eat after removing outer layers (exocarp, mesocarp) is a seed.
Outside the context of a botany classroom, you’re going to have a hard time finding people who respond to the question “Is cucumber a vegetable or a fruit?” with the answer “fruit, of course!”
I assume that by "slow burn," you mean to say that climate change takes place on a time scale that goes beyond just one or two decades. If that's true, then how can we possibly judge the accuracy of the newer "hot" models except by looking at how well they predict past climate data? And by that metric, some of them do just as well as the older, less "hot" models that we've been basing climate policy on for decades. Is there some other metric you're using to dismiss the new models? I hope it's clear why I think you're contradicting yourself, but maybe you have some other way of telling whether a climate model is accurate.
I think there is some validity to what you say about risk assessment, and I have the general feeling that there is some real hysteria among younger generations w.r.t. climate change. There may be more pressing issues, but again, if it is the case that we can expect to see much hotter temperatures than previously predicted, then everyone, regardless of wealth or location, should be concerned for their own wellbeing in the near future.
Also, if we granted your fourth point, it would be impossible to establish the first point; you can't say both things at the same time.
Regarding point 2, if the "hot" models are accurate, then climate change is something that will effect us maybe one or two generations from now, if it isn't already (it's a little hard to tell whether we are in a particularly hot period right now and will regress to the mean). Even if you are completely selfish, anti-natalist, and atheist, you should probably still be concerned.
I think this could have been avoided entirely if you had given a shoutout to OP. It doesn’t seem like you copied their code, but it does seem like you were inspired by their idea. Open-source software is built on collaboration and recognition. Give credit where credit is due, even if it’s just a small credit.