208 karma · joined December 28, 2020
https://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/local/crime/article89...
I said NC but it was Myrtle Beach, SC, sorry. Names: Rafael Aguilar, 31, and Carmelo Marmolejo-Calixto.
http://gunmemorial.org/2016/07/11/rafael-aguilar
Archived screenshot with his occupation listed as '2016 Clinton campaign aid (sic)': https://archive.is/pB7BX
Conclusive? No. But should have been seriously dug into instead of the giant deafening silence we had.
And one other thing I forgot to mention: Seymour Hersh, one of the finest old-school investigative journos in the world, dug in to this and confirmed all sorts of weird things: the FBI got access to Rich's PC, Rich contacted Wikileaks, Rich had DNC emails on his computer and so on.
Sure it can. It's the copyright holder.
>they almost seem to be hinging their entire case on this one point.
It has nothing to do with the network weights. Fat Fritz and Houdini are derivative works of Stockfish. Fat Fritz may be compliant with the GPL 3.0 (after being reported for violation) but Houdini certainly isn't.
"Your honor, the defendant is distributing my copyrighted work without a license. Make him stop please."
This is a category error when it comes to copyleft licenses like the GPL. It has nothing to say about usage.
"If, on the other hand, the licensor and licensee both have some obligations (in OSS, this is usually when you modify or redistribute the source or compiled product), then it's basically a contract, no matter what RMS claims."
No it's not. There are no pre-agreed terms, penalties for violation, expected compensation for services provided or anything like that. GPLed software is copyrighted. Copyright law says you have no rights to copy it or make derivative works of it whatsoever. The license permits you to do so.
"Why would you trust what he says about contract law, a field where he has no professional training whatsoever?"
Because, surprise surprise, he has advice from people who ARE trained in the law.
No no no. Licenses are NOT contracts. Someone who copies or makes derivative works of copylefted software which they then distribute is obliged to remain within the bounds of the license not because they voluntarily promised, but because they don't have any right to act at all except as the license permits.
The one and only Tony Heller: https://realclimatescience.com/2021/06/yes-climate-change-ma...
>Solar activity hasn’t been increasing massively over the last century, whilst average temperatures did.
Not really. The earth has been gently cooling down since the 1930s. The US has the best temperature records which is why it's the most useful to study.
Strange then that the number of hot days and average maximum temperature in the US has dropped sharply in the last century. But I'm sure you're right and the sun has fuck all to do with earth's temperature.
https://electroverse.net/record-breaking-cold-and-snow-sweep...
This sort of thing happens with lower solar activity.