domlebo70

Devils advocate: Are they? Why? If LLM's are capable of taking absolute crap and iterating on it to achieve a purpose, then does readability really matter?

Awesome. Similar experience to me. Was selling some sim racing gear, and he mentioned he was in fabrication. Now he's my fab guy and we chat heaps.

Yeah, but at the end of the day you can't be sure right? That doubt would eat away at me

How does one even go about finding a root cause so exotic?

I love it. Easy to write and understand

Very good way to describe it. I am enjoying Opus a lot.

Maybe I'm solving different problems to you, but I don't think I've seen a single "idiot moment" from Claude Code this entire week. I've had to massage things to get them more aligned with how I want things, but I don't recall any basic syntax or logic errors.

Unclear what to do. I obviously could have invested another 30s and figured it out.

I really like the scenarios - i think there's a lot of value there. I wonder if you can double down on that somehow.

I've been on the site for 10m, and I'm loving it. I find the interface quite confusing. I'm getting value from the theory tidbits, and the scenarios. The simulation was confusing and i just noped out. I'd say the UI is a bit too overdone

I don't code in Python much. Are those type annotations really how people are using them, or is it just for the example?

    def list_files_tool(path: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:

And it returns

    {
        "path": str(full_path),
        "files": all_files
    }

Is that useful?

We do this via run in TS:

    export const run = <T>(f: () => T): T => {
      return f();
    };

Do you use plan mode? Do you link specific files as reference using @? Those two alone make a big difference for me.

I've never used it, but watched from afar. So many interesting ideas. The website is also really good. Congrats Paul and team

You need to do more drugs then.

Interesting name

I was wondering if you had any thoughts on the CS2 rollout (2 years and counting) and the number of bugs, poor performance, and issues?

How do people deploy docker containers on a machine like this? We currently use Cloud Run, which is very hands off. How is a deploy done?

With Auth.js, I assume they control the database layer? I.e. can i supply my own functions for reading and writing to the DB, or I have to use their Kysely stuff?

Reminds me of this post https://maxgreenwald.me/blog/do-more-with-run

I now reach for this a lot to allow me to write expression oriented programs in JS

Very balanced post thank you. Often these posts tout an approach, and never consider downsides.

What do people think of Phaser? Currently playing around with it. API seems pretty large

Does anyone know how it works? Is it some sort of wave function collapse?

Gotta say, that animation is amazing.

Thanks. I am about to start an app using Tauri, and styling the UI so it doesn't feel like a "web app" is a concern of mine

Hey. Well done on launch. Looks very sleek. So the frontend is some sort of JS/CSS app. How did you get it so native looking? What UI libs are you using, or just tailwind classes?

This is great. I run a very very similar platform. How are your prices so cheap? 120$ for 500 studies a year?

I had never heard of inverseMap. I suppose it only works where every variant can only be parsed in the same way it is rendered.

Yeah this is where I heard about it :P I showed all my dev friends, and our minds were equally blown away by the obviousness of it.

To OP: You could avoid the visitor by using an IIFE style switch using the run utility fn:

    export const run = <T>(f: () => T): T => f();

Now you can go:

    const inferred_type = run(() => {
      switch(blah) {
        ...
      }
    })

YousefED, love Blocknote, but I ended up not using it for a new project, just because it's too prescriptive. Which I totally get is a positive for many. I.e they want the UI and controls built in and off the shelf. I would love to just use the Core API (block etc) and get some useful hooks, so I can extend it in my own ways