369 karma · joined February 8, 2021
[0] https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonathanponciano/2021/09/07/el-...
Largely in the right direction.
Do some googling before commenting please.
You can authenticate yourself with a tiny tiny bitcoin payment over the lightning network.
This is not true, custody is very well understood when it comes to blockchain assets. Legal definitions of ownership are another question altogether that do require continual legislative attention, see Wyoming’s work in this area.[1]
You’ve also repeated the sins of the top comment by glossing over the actual issues with this provision by focusing on facts that almost everyone in the cryptocurrency space are in total agreement on.
> Tether and Binance are exemplars of pathological noncompliance.
The amendments to this provision are focusing on who should be excluded from these new requirements, of which Binance & Tether (or terms that could be construed to mean Binance or Tether) are nowhere to be found. The exceptions focus on miners, node operators, noncustodial software providers, and alternative consensus mechanism validators.
[1] https://www.google.com/amp/s/slate.com/technology/2021/06/wy...
Have you looked into how strike.me is using Bitcoin? It’s essentially a Venmo/cash app competitor that is transacting over the bitcoin lightning network. So you keep your balance in usd but because lightning provides instant transactions when you want to spend to another lightning user from strike they will buy bitcoin at the current price and send the transaction on your behalf or vice versa. What’s cool about this is that you don’t know anything about the other end of the transaction. I believe this is the direction Dorsey wants cash app to go in.
Also how do you know the number of validators is correct? In other words can’t that be Sybiled?